Re: configure tool

diff --git a/44/afe5d4c2e5a1125ca8686cf358b923c469eea2 b/44/afe5d4c2e5a1125ca8686cf358b923c469eea2
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..384a7a6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/44/afe5d4c2e5a1125ca8686cf358b923c469eea2
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+Return-Path: <chevalier.ronny@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393DB6DE0AF8\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 19 May 2015 12:08:58 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.585\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.585 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.235,\r
+  DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+ RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01,\r
+ SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id cTxyoxn0fKik for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Tue, 19 May 2015 12:08:52 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-oi0-f46.google.com (mail-oi0-f46.google.com\r
+ [209.85.218.46])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14B6E6DE0A87\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 19 May 2015 12:08:52 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by oiko83 with SMTP id o83so18875833oik.1\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 19 May 2015 12:08:51 -0700 (PDT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
+ h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to\r
+ :cc:content-type;\r
+ bh=WCNUn87yqZ8/NuByz1btNMoXVo36+11XfdqM2EhCt00=;\r
+ b=B08kaMIAKaI0QXxm4Hzkzo37kvb5CaGjlVO0N5fJtv4Jo58jatymQ5drC5Y66LXTkn\r
+ swg9TzEfFu1kMhfBFHIf0r0s3xYFzeK02RXvDi1+RhmXQVfknUUVmUABCjRpNl2AF79M\r
+ oimtyCKO0DD1V5/xEq/NAIC6AfZbOLL4DoyWT1CDBWvjexG3nYYy/7j6sk1wHZDqOHaq\r
+ O5Z//UymJ83JMJJA+WNxAnSqpIwYt5TIWrpaVAnztR8MsHcpk2GbC3q0KHS6b0EO45qo\r
+ KglNTHrEya/jUsJcQlWFi1iRNe6fapzfMPAvZOVPuCV6TNXl9gDNUPNf2yMrtAi5San5\r
+ 3ong==\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+X-Received: by 10.60.65.97 with SMTP id w1mr25193243oes.10.1432062531359; Tue,\r
+ 19 May 2015 12:08:51 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by 10.202.201.130 with HTTP; Tue, 19 May 2015 12:08:51 -0700 (PDT)\r
+In-Reply-To: <87y4kkfl38.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+References:\r
+ <CABPZE7JWDGnsnS-TFRRTOdSbC09qiRS4gtL=rPP1aXeiQEMbug@mail.gmail.com>\r
+ <87y4kkfl38.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 21:08:51 +0200\r
+Message-ID:\r
+ <CABPZE7+zDwFj7Y1OMU0DVwpwUedK6qUZLQcKEZTMNdRr0A=NeQ@mail.gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: configure tool\r
+From: Ronny Chevalier <chevalier.ronny@gmail.com>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 19:08:58 -0000\r
+\r
+On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 9:01 PM, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
+> Ronny Chevalier <chevalier.ronny@gmail.com> writes:\r
+>\r
+>> Hi,\r
+>>\r
+>> I'm curious about the reason behind choosing to do your own configure\r
+>> tool instead of using tools like autotools or cmake?\r
+>\r
+> I guess the most relevant discussion is not that recent:\r
+>\r
+>     http://mid.gmane.org/1258897630-22282-1-git-send-email-jeff@ocjtech.us\r
+>\r
+> and to a lesser extent the discussion starting atL\r
+>\r
+>     http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.notmuch.general/635\r
+>\r
+\r
+Ok thanks I will look into it.\r
+\r
+>> For example, I noticed that the part that check if the compiler\r
+>> options are supported, is not working. Try adding a flag supported by\r
+>> gcc but not by clang and use clang to compile or vice-versa.\r
+>\r
+> Sure, of course there can be bugs, just as in any configuration system.\r
+> Can you give a more specific recipe to reproduce it?\r
+\r
+Yeah I forgot to provide an example sorry.\r
+\r
+-Wdouble-promotion for example is available on gcc but not clang and\r
+it is still added to the command line when using clang. I think this\r
+is because clang does not return an error code, but just prints a\r
+warning.\r
+\r
+>\r
+> Thanks,\r
+>\r
+> d\r