Re: [notmuch] patchwork test instance
authorSebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:25:49 +0000 (10:25 +0100)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:36:09 +0000 (09:36 -0800)
f8/cb4379f0b3b86ec26513c369ae8664e7daecf2 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/f8/cb4379f0b3b86ec26513c369ae8664e7daecf2 b/f8/cb4379f0b3b86ec26513c369ae8664e7daecf2
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..78adc74
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+Return-Path: <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6689431FBD\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:26:12 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.62\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.621,\r
+       BAYES_50=0.001] autolearn=ham\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id HQbaRB15BYAT for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:26:12 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from homiemail-a17.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcagg.dreamhost.com\r
+       [208.97.132.66])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 162B7431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:26:12 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from sspaeth.de (mtec-hg-docking-1-dhcp-204.ethz.ch\r
+       [129.132.133.204])\r
+       by homiemail-a17.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6CE4F7A8060\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:25:51 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by sspaeth.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation);\r
+       Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:25:49 +0100\r
+From: "Sebastian Spaeth" <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+In-Reply-To: <20100210032503.GA19427@lapse.rw.madduck.net>\r
+References: <87d4148s2c.fsf@lillypad.riseup.net>\r
+       <4B595D3A.1030901@SSpaeth.de> <87636u34lw.fsf@SSpaeth.de>\r
+       <87d411zvz8.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+       <20100125213231.GB15987@lapse.rw.madduck.net>\r
+       <960df8f6a8a08f2ca3aceef5a216d691.squirrel@webmail.sspaeth.de>\r
+       <87wrz4fqsw.fsf@lillypad.riseup.net>\r
+       <20100127194149.GA23034@lapse.rw.madduck.net>\r
+       <20100128070522.GA18649@ukfsn.org>\r
+       <20100201223112.GA20288@lapse.rw.madduck.net>\r
+       <20100210032503.GA19427@lapse.rw.madduck.net>\r
+Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:25:49 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87aavhsaqq.fsf@SSpaeth.de>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+Subject: Re: [notmuch] patchwork test instance\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:26:12 -0000\r
+\r
+On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:25:03 +1300, martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net> wrote:\r
+> > http://patchwork.madduck.net/project/notmuch/list/ now exists.\r
+> \r
+> Are people actually using it? I know that merging patches is\r
+> impossible, and that sucks, but otherwise: is this something to keep\r
+> around, or should I take the site offline again?\r
+\r
+As long as patches aren't being marked as "rejected" or "superseded", I\r
+don't think it will be that useful in the long run. If it were actually\r
+maintained by a few people, this would probably be different.\r
+\r
+The alternative I can see is that we create a web page of patches based\r
+on carls notmuch tags (the tagging scheme he uses is unknown to me\r
+though).\r
+\r
+Something like:\r
+\r
+"notmuch dump tag:notmuch and tag:patch" could be used to construct a\r
+list of "accepted", "willnottakeit","superseded" and "pending" lists or\r
+whatever. If that list were made accessible somewhere, this would be\r
+super useful. At least it would help me see whether Carl just hasn't\r
+gotten around to including my "press 'd' for delete" patch or whether he\r
+is not interested in merging it. :)\r
+\r
+Sebastian\r