sub import {
hook(type => "getsetup", id => "passwordauth", "call" => \&getsetup);
- hook(type => "formbuilder_setup", id => "passwordauth", call => \&formbuilder_setup);
- hook(type => "formbuilder", id => "passwordauth", call => \&formbuilder);
+ hook(type => "formbuilder_setup", id => "passwordauth", call => \&formbuilder_setup);
+ hook(type => "formbuilder", id => "passwordauth", call => \&formbuilder);
hook(type => "sessioncgi", id => "passwordauth", call => \&sessioncgi);
+ hook(type => "auth", id => "passwordauth", call => \&auth);
}
sub getsetup () {
}
}
+sub auth ($$) {
+ # While this hook is not currently used, it needs to exist
+ # so ikiwiki knows that the wiki supports logins, and will
+ # enable the Preferences page.
+}
+
1
if (length $config{cgiurl}) {
$template->param(editurl => cgiurl(do => "edit", page => $page))
if IkiWiki->can("cgi_editpage");
- $template->param(prefsurl => cgiurl(do => "prefs"));
+ $template->param(prefsurl => cgiurl(do => "prefs"))
+ if exists $hooks{auth};
$actions++;
}
is not available. Closes: #532285
* meta: Add openid delegate parameter to allow delegating only
openid or openid2.
+ * Disable the Preferences link if no plugin with an auth hook is enabled.
-- Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:03:41 -0400
>>> Adding a new `canlogin` hook looks like overkill to me. [[Joey]], how
>>> about making registration of the `auth` hook mandatory for all plugins
>>> making sense of the "Preferences" link? --[[Lunar]]
+
+>>>> Hmm, using the `auth` hook existance does seem like a nice solution.
+>>>> While splitting the preferences code out into its own plugin is
+>>>> easily enough done, it has the minor problem of being yet another
+>>>> file nearly all ikiwikis will have to load, and also, prefs would
+>>>> have to be disabled manually. So I like that using the hook would
+>>>> cause it to auto-disable if nothing uses it. It's a bit ugly that
+>>>> passwordauth doesn't need an auth hook (it could be reorged to
+>>>> use it instead of formbuilder, maybe) and would probably just have an
+>>>> empty one. Thanks for the idea. --[[Joey]] [[done]]