--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29DB540C445\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 06:12:56 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.502\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+ NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id ene+-cVxR5-6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Fri, 6 Jun 2014 06:12:52 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])\r
+ (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87EED40B039\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 06:12:52 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])\r
+ by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)\r
+ (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+ id 1Wstww-00070H-9F; Fri, 06 Jun 2014 14:12:50 +0100\r
+Received: from 5751dfa2.skybroadband.com ([87.81.223.162] helo=localhost)\r
+ by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.71)\r
+ (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+ id 1Wstwb-0002ka-Td; Fri, 06 Jun 2014 14:12:30 +0100\r
+From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+To: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com>,\r
+ notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] emacs: Add support for saved search accelerators\r
+In-Reply-To: <cunwqdrbkd0.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+References: <1399385776-19918-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>\r
+ <1399461694-25350-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>\r
+ <1399461694-25350-2-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>\r
+ <87zjislji0.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> <87oaz5uzco.fsf@gmail.com>\r
+ <cunwqdrbkd0.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+615~g78e3a93 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 14:12:28 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87y4xadvwj.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+X-Sender-Host-Address: 87.81.223.162\r
+X-QM-Geographic: According to ripencc,\r
+ this message was delivered by a machine in Britain (UK) (GB).\r
+X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :)\r
+X-QM-Body-MD5: 33be7a01c88354b199659a5f2b9cd5a1 (of first 20000 bytes)\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Score: -0.1\r
+X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: /\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to\r
+ determine if it is\r
+ spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.\r
+ This message scored -0.1 points.\r
+ Summary of the scoring: \r
+ * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail\r
+ provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)\r
+ * -0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list\r
+X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 13:12:56 -0000\r
+\r
+On Mon, 12 May 2014, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:\r
+> On Sat, May 10 2014, Aaron Ecay wrote:\r
+>> 2014ko maiatzak 8an, Mark Walters-ek idatzi zuen:\r
+>>>\r
+>>> Hi\r
+>>>\r
+>>> This version looks good to me.\r
+>>>\r
+>>> The only slight query I have is which key to bind it to: Austin used g\r
+>>> in notmuch-go and this uses j. Austin said on irc that he chose g\r
+>>> because it wasn't bound and matched gmail's shortcut.\r
+>>>\r
+>>> Personally I like j (as it starts fewer words than g) and given that we\r
+>>> don't match any of gmail's other bindings I don't think there is much\r
+>>> advantage to doing so in this case.\r
+>>\r
+>> All other things being equal, I=E2=80=99d prefer =E2=80=9Cj=E2=80=9D her=\r
+e, but for different\r
+>> reasons. =E2=80=9Cg=E2=80=9D is the emacs-standard key to refresh or re=\r
+vert a buffer.\r
+>> In my personal customization file I bound =E2=80=9Cg=E2=80=9D to\r
+>> notmuch-refresh-this-buffer in notmuch-(show/search)-mode-map long ago\r
+>> (and forgot this binding was not standard until reading above that g is\r
+>> not bound). It=E2=80=99s probably better emacs citizenship to not use s=\r
+uch a\r
+>> standard key for a different purpose.\r
+>\r
+> +1, though I won't lose sleep.\r
+\r
+That sounds like a consensus so +1 from me.\r
+\r
+Best wishes\r
+\r
+Mark\r
+\r
+\r