Re: Difference between search and filter

diff --git a/bf/39dbf32ebb24a3be1c16d74f65d22ffe969691 b/bf/39dbf32ebb24a3be1c16d74f65d22ffe969691
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..c9ad1cf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/bf/39dbf32ebb24a3be1c16d74f65d22ffe969691
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+Return-Path: <rlb@defaultvalue.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7DEA431FD0\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 08:53:24 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id LVvL7VNDkdzp for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Fri, 26 Nov 2010 08:53:24 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from defaultvalue.org (defaultvalue.org [70.85.129.156])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99346431FB5\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 08:53:24 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from omen.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D83390D34;\r
+       Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:53:24 -0600 (CST)\r
+Received: from raven.defaultvalue.org (raven.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7])\r
+       by omen.defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 213AC501EE;\r
+       Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:53:24 -0600 (CST)\r
+Received: by raven.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 0C93A7BA304; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:53:24 -0600 (CST)\r
+From: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>\r
+To: Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>\r
+Subject: Re: Difference between search and filter\r
+References: <m2ochf2ibe.fsf@deb.maillard.im>\r
+       <87bpdex6re.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+       <m2mxox1gai.fsf@kcals.maillard.im>\r
+       <877hg0doc9.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org>\r
+Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:53:24 -0600\r
+In-Reply-To: <877hg0doc9.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org> (Rob Browning's message\r
+       of "Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:47:02 -0600")\r
+Message-ID: <87y68gc9h7.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org>\r
+User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 16:53:25 -0000\r
+\r
+Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org> writes:\r
+\r
+> Though I'm also used to 'f' and 'F' for "followup" commands (as compared\r
+> to 'r' and 'R' for reply commands), so I'd have to get used to 'f' as\r
+> something else, regardless.\r
+\r
+Also, is notmuch planning to support both followup and reply?  If so,\r
+then it might make sense to start thinking about the desired\r
+keybindings.\r
+\r
+For example, at least in gnus, 'F' (followup with quoted original) is\r
+one of the commands I use most offten.\r
+\r
+-- \r
+Rob Browning\r
+rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org\r
+GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4\r