--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F14F429E5B\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:49:06 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.098\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+ NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id K9M9p5LW442v for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:49:04 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])\r
+ (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55B00429E25\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:49:04 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])\r
+ by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)\r
+ (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+ id 1RsNRb-0004D7-Nu; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:49:00 +0000\r
+Received: from 94-192-233-223.zone6.bethere.co.uk ([94.192.233.223]\r
+ helo=localhost)\r
+ by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69)\r
+ (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+ id 1RsNRb-0005oE-FB; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:48:59 +0000\r
+From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+To: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] emacs: Allow the indentation of content to be\r
+ toggled.\r
+In-Reply-To: <cunobtjaliz.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+References: <id:"1327486729-18052-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org">\r
+ <1327999620-14595-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>\r
+ <1327999620-14595-4-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>\r
+ <87d39zu9v4.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+ <cunobtjaliz.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+137~gd5f6ffb (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1\r
+ (i486-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:50:06 +0000\r
+Message-ID: <87lionsa8h.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Sender-Host-Address: 94.192.233.223\r
+X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :)\r
+X-QM-Body-MD5: abd42748fdc252aa090b5c5145b2bc75 (of first 20000 bytes)\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8\r
+X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: -\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to\r
+ determine if it is\r
+ spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.\r
+ This message scored -1.8 points.\r
+ Summary of the scoring: \r
+ * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,\r
+ * medium trust\r
+ * [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org]\r
+ * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail\r
+ provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)\r
+ * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay\r
+ * domain\r
+ * 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list\r
+X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:49:06 -0000\r
+\r
+On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:23:32 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:\r
+> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:15:11 +0000, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+> > Hi I have reviewed the patch series within the limits of my lisp\r
+> > knowledge. Patch 1: is rather beyond my lisp so I won't comment on that\r
+> > (and I have never tried crypto): Patches 2-5 look fine with one\r
+> > bikeshed and one query for my own understanding.\r
+> \r
+> Thanks.\r
+> \r
+> > The bikeshed is that I agree with Jani in\r
+> > id:"CAB+hUn8KhXHTRCdrLe0cT=8mdtz9ZntPFf13mq0iCo4CX=B-Jg@mail.gmail.com"\r
+> > that I would prefer to reserve '>' for saving a file.\r
+> \r
+> '<' is 'remove indent', or 'look to the left'.\r
+> '>' is 'toggle truncation', or 'look to the right'.\r
+> \r
+> (I'm not overly worried about this - would 't' be more acceptable?)\r
+\r
+I personally would prefer 't' but it is easy to remap so it really isn't\r
+important.\r
+\r
+Best wishes\r
+\r
+Mark\r
+\r