Re: [bug] [wish] notmuch should search on date received

diff --git a/dc/e60c759af30de1a9aa5e55f534a890e2615569 b/dc/e60c759af30de1a9aa5e55f534a890e2615569
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..92d4537
--- /dev/null
+++ b/dc/e60c759af30de1a9aa5e55f534a890e2615569
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A9D6DE1919\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  4 May 2015 01:26:53 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.319\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.319 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.319]\r
+ autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id 2T5HafWB9crf for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Mon,  4 May 2015 01:26:51 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com (gitolite.debian.net\r
+ [87.98.215.224])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2BAE6DE1917\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  4 May 2015 01:26:50 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from remotemail by mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com with local (Exim\r
+ 4.80) (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+ id 1YpBhF-0002Bs-F1; Mon, 04 May 2015 08:25:49 +0000\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 27005 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 04 May 2015\r
+ 08:25:38 -0000\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Gregor Zattler <telegraph@gmx.net>, notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: [bug] [wish] notmuch should search on date received\r
+In-Reply-To: <20150503101412.GB25636@boo.workgroup>\r
+References: <20150503101412.GB25636@boo.workgroup>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.19+96~g703c8f9 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 10:25:38 +0200\r
+Message-ID: <87pp6gagvx.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 08:26:53 -0000\r
+\r
+Gregor Zattler <telegraph@gmx.net> writes:\r
+\r
+> Dear notmuch developers,\r
+>\r
+> I wished notmuch could search on (the top most) Received: -header\r
+> since not all emails have correct Date: -headers.\r
+>\r
+> Rationale: Show all emails since yesterday=E2=80=A6  This is immensely\r
+> important for my work flow.\r
+\r
+These are two somewhat different requests. Being able to search on the\r
+Received headers would involve a usual kind of term search, but not date\r
+searching.  This might be problematic as a default because of the volume\r
+of received headers.  In order to use it for date search, it would need\r
+to be parsed for data information and either override the Date:-header\r
+or provide a second prefix like received-date.  Or maybe a single\r
+message could have multiple date: prefixed terms, I'm not sure.\r
+\r
+d\r
+\r