decryption error for signed+encrypted messages
authorJameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
Fri, 4 Nov 2011 18:00:19 +0000 (11:00 +1700)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:39:58 +0000 (09:39 -0800)
06/98e84841b678485bc239cca7c765bd0ad66fb2 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/06/98e84841b678485bc239cca7c765bd0ad66fb2 b/06/98e84841b678485bc239cca7c765bd0ad66fb2
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..7998adc
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60FD7429E25\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  4 Nov 2011 11:00:26 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id Dlz5Q1B62Wo8 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Fri,  4 Nov 2011 11:00:26 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4712431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  4 Nov 2011 11:00:25 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492672E50A1B\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  4 Nov 2011 11:00:23 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from finestructure.net (gwave-223.ligo.caltech.edu\r
+ [131.215.114.223])    (Authenticated sender: jrollins)        by fire-doxen-submit\r
+ (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BCD9328030   for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  4\r
+ Nov 2011 11:00:21 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 210D49C1; Fri,  4 Nov 2011 11:00:22 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: decryption error for signed+encrypted messages\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.9+39~g74c9dba (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:00:19 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <87obwrix8s.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 18:00:26 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+\r
+I just wanted to note on-list that I've run into what I think is a GMIME\r
+bug having to do with encrypted messages.  I think this has been\r
+mentioned on IRC, but I wanted to document it here (so that we can tag\r
+it with our new bug tracker!).\r
+\r
+Decryption of messages that are both signed and encrypted seems to fail\r
+if the signers key is not present in the users keyring.  I don't see any\r
+reason why decryption should fail, since it shouldn't have anything to\r
+do with the signer.  The message should decrypt, and there should only\r
+be a signature verification error.\r
+\r
+I haven't checked to see if this has been reported upstream or not.\r
+I'll try to look into it.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJOtCgzAAoJEO00zqvie6q89dMQAK5VSFyNc25tpGgPEOmgkPRc\r
+3r0aqutPBhTAxRLFMkf0QHIVh3BcAcVn0AlOTmq2eaUtZVF9vV7Z9DskP5Rjt5Gp\r
+TsGGWOr4kecFJHOspOFWF8roJ5uys0NCyY7hw0BkXyjd5AZCDsIHBVCBZd74HPC8\r
+kVEP7VSuTCaudPfzs9yejo8uy5DCT8dIQeZtgQSRKOI8d3NOdqEMSZz99MjQYUom\r
+LteHJ1Cg7Fw2PIyB9ZpWbP+pF2ErundCr0jO5arA+G0qeJ4XKQDpUpS2Wr+eA3DP\r
+CyrhXh1RmdokmaaChHHHsxLhRJe0yyl+yDZvIsmqbKtnIhP3NMo9Mf9FKr7yLEmU\r
+NTnuT6wiDlpDRjifsxvHw2t6Uae/2TeCEza87IR/S5j/OXVksfRcEWVJg2cywGQe\r
+/INXa3JPH6pVvkyA0LPI/X4mpMCJKANkGjClWBTNHQI4tq4/GJCqWLLfIa0HN+P4\r
+f4tjBBgFSzvN73yljjNHelsIJpH3gWHVE9cw1TzYht1oru60GBRA5dvh2irB2sI0\r
+Uz72bfChq0iJwE9DqCVJ94nWAjAlPZ7kW90YMqDH62zoyhJVbUhClk1qyxvURsO8\r
+d70VD2yERUHTG0QD4+c6NkiZFVn4tGFDHjIWTlXWaSedEd5qib5mBIuSwZzA314x\r
+djLKJPbhDA3LDss6Jdav\r
+=8cZq\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r