Re: folder and path completely broken in HEAD?

diff --git a/7a/6ad0b4a1f9e5fb43dbcbae93cc4a905c46b671 b/7a/6ad0b4a1f9e5fb43dbcbae93cc4a905c46b671
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..acb8642
--- /dev/null
+++ b/7a/6ad0b4a1f9e5fb43dbcbae93cc4a905c46b671
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+Return-Path:\r
+ <return-duxdjczv2pab8eavjy6z79jm3e@temporary-address.scs.stanford.edu>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C03431FD9\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  2 May 2014 21:58:05 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.3\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id P48BOXXEj7Yx for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Fri,  2 May 2014 21:57:54 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from market.scs.stanford.edu (market.scs.stanford.edu [171.66.3.10])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A17BA431FC2\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  2 May 2014 21:57:54 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from market.scs.stanford.edu (localhost.scs.stanford.edu\r
+ [127.0.0.1])  by market.scs.stanford.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id\r
+ s434voW7023771;       Fri, 2 May 2014 21:57:50 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: (from dm@localhost)\r
+       by market.scs.stanford.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id s434voZs016780;\r
+       Fri, 2 May 2014 21:57:50 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Authentication-Warning: market.scs.stanford.edu: dm set sender to\r
+       return-duxdjczv2pab8eavjy6z79jm3e@ta.scs.stanford.edu using -f\r
+From: dm-list-email-notmuch@scs.stanford.edu\r
+To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
+Subject: Re: folder and path completely broken in HEAD?\r
+Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 21:57:49 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <87oazfo3w2.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+Reply-To: David Mazieres expires 2014-07-31 PDT\r
+       <mazieres-dznikihr9t4gcgb72gnhf9954a@temporary-address.scs.stanford.edu>\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 May 2014 04:58:05 -0000\r
+\r
+Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> writes:\r
+\r
+> On Fri, 02 May 2014, dm-list-email-notmuch@scs.stanford.edu wrote:\r
+>>\r
+>> I'm using a pretty standard maildir++ layout.  For example, underneath\r
+>> my database.path I have a bunch of mail in directories such as:\r
+>>\r
+>>     .INBOX.Main/{new,cur}\r
+>>     .mail.class/{new,cur}\r
+>>     .mail.voicemail/{new,cur}\r
+>> ...\r
+> Here's additional commentary on the specific queries.\r
+>\r
+>>         linux7$ ./notmuch count folder:mail\r
+>>         0\r
+>>         linux8$ ./notmuch count folder:.mail\r
+>>         0\r
+\r
+Oh, man.  That's a serious bummer.\r
+\r
+Is there any mechanism left that would let me hierarchically group\r
+messages?  I've got a ton of mail.* folders, and create new ones\r
+dynamically.  I really want a mechanism to group them hierarchically, so\r
+I can have a search that matches all current and future mail\r
+directories.  I organized my whole mail setup around folders because a)\r
+tags do not provide this kind of hierarchical control, and b) there\r
+doesn't seem to be a convenient way to apply tags 100% reliably on\r
+message delivery, whereas I *can* control the folder 100% reliably.\r
+\r
+Worse, because of my poor performance, I was hoping to segregate\r
+messages by year.  So it would be:\r
+\r
+  2013/.mail.class\r
+  2013/.mail.voicemail\r
+  2014/.mail.class\r
+  2014/.mail.voicemail\r
+\r
+All the way back.  Now you are saying there will be no convenient way to\r
+match just the "mail.class" part without the year?  How very\r
+distressing.  Ugh.\r
+\r
+David\r