--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46F18431FB6\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:20:30 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+ FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id n+KeSfXdvH4C for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:20:25 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-lb0-f177.google.com (mail-lb0-f177.google.com\r
+ [209.85.217.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CF6A431FAF\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:20:25 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by mail-lb0-f177.google.com with SMTP id x10so1391322lbi.22\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:20:23 -0700 (PDT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
+ h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id\r
+ :subject:from:to:cc:content-type;\r
+ bh=k7LfQFQs/CwHWzHhLviNAeh8GwWYlTVEhUCr3CnH22A=;\r
+ b=tq5NKWhyjhVkrQx2vioWBbkMJ+zZHQD9JBMAYFX87bS1N7Adt9mBaMsNU5JtySvq4v\r
+ jDk9JK0vcRdFXJsWIF+dKvSQ6XlzRTjNyn8nqOelJGYGCYJYHkzZudkFO5KYiXZALHzT\r
+ /2Ow7W7NsYfIRyAGIH01Bh/qxEUqo7SDedzHwATCMu5K6q3VyNfgpOfGBRLv4jf+aQNZ\r
+ W4JNC78r2ZT1kqw3zDn/+x73nAMtblOw2FfEjvZmkQIFkIEttMSaI0m5dDPmYiL7xIf7\r
+ hPR7bhQ67QP2pjQMejK66ALDPl1VeMjNE0zIjq9EdZg35XS21br0usZmGAXGzkwMRZ02\r
+ YU2A==\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+X-Received: by 10.112.139.226 with SMTP id rb2mr16134410lbb.12.1366788022580; \r
+ Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:20:22 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by 10.114.83.167 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:20:22 -0700 (PDT)\r
+In-Reply-To: <878v48om5u.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+References: <1365031678-25188-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
+ <87y5clte1j.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+ <CAMP44s07KeL4uAChs3KFiqwcsCwWTvni6MzFGzXNeO7=sd6U6Q@mail.gmail.com>\r
+ <87wqs4rsjm.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+ <CAMP44s2RuAGjJV089swpjwG9i5X=sARPYve6XZPyK7X7QwZBDg@mail.gmail.com>\r
+ <878v48om5u.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 02:20:22 -0500\r
+Message-ID:\r
+ <CAMP44s2W_N2qha9GaadGzJDgqwqW41Nwsgc+UVL7P1h937CAFQ@mail.gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] debian: package ruby bindings\r
+From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
+To: David Bremner <bremner@debian.org>\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 07:20:30 -0000\r
+\r
+On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 6:35 PM, David Bremner <bremner@debian.org> wrote:\r
+> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:\r
+>\r
+>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:34 AM, David Bremner <bremner@debian.org> wrote:\r
+>>>\r
+>>> OK, but that doesn't really help us deal with support requests e.g. on IRC.\r
+>>> Some "feature requests" for the bindings:\r
+>>\r
+>> Can you point to some of these requests, or are they hypothetical?\r
+>\r
+> I don't know how many support requests we've got, but yes, I remember at\r
+> least one.\r
+\r
+That's not a huge motivation.\r
+\r
+>> Moreover, wouldn't making sure that the bindings are package mostly\r
+>> solve this issue?\r
+>\r
+> Well, people wouldn't have to build and install the bindings, _if_ they\r
+> happened to be using an OS with packages available. But not everyone\r
+> uses binary packages. I guess for me it's just a software quality issue\r
+> to have some minimal level of documentation.\r
+\r
+If somebody needs that information it's very easy find, just googling\r
+'notmuch ruby bindings', or looking at the way packages do it, which\r
+this patch actually helps to solve.\r
+\r
+-- \r
+Felipe Contreras\r