--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D365431FC7\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 22:46:06 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+ autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id qAPFBQEpw5qf for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Sun, 30 Nov 2014 22:45:57 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155])\r
+ (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 138E5431FBC\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 22:45:56 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80)\r
+ (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+ id 1XvKk6-0002hx-0p; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 02:45:54 -0400\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 17696 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 01 Dec 2014\r
+ 06:45:48 -0000\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org,\r
+ 759646@bugs.debian.org\r
+Subject: Re: [Vagrant Cascadian] Bug#759646: notmuch-emacs: switching mode=\r
+ to invalid value sends unencrypted mail\r
+In-Reply-To: <cunegsjg9d8.fsf@gargravarr.hh.sledj.net>\r
+References: <87lhq7npcw.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <87k35q2zso.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+ <54055C53.40604@fifthhorseman.net>\r
+ <m238caa1rk.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+ <cunzjbwi36y.fsf@gargravarr.hh.sledj.net>\r
+ <87egsldds6.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+ <cunegsjg9d8.fsf@gargravarr.hh.sledj.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.19+2~g32855b9 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 07:45:48 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87388zdg0z.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 06:46:06 -0000\r
+\r
+David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> writes:\r
+\r
+>> I'm a little torn what to do here. On the one hand the upstream change\r
+>> fixes the bug as reported. On the other hand, if something corrupts the\r
+>> #secure tag (e.g., by deleting a letter), then the message is still sent\r
+>> un-uncrypted.\r
+>\r
+> I'm unclear on what you mean. Is it that "upgrade to 24.4" is not a good\r
+> enough answer, because we are still leaving pre-24.4 people out in the\r
+> cold?\r
+\r
+No, I mean the fix is rather narrow in that editing somewhere else on\r
+the same line causes the same problem as before, even in 24.4\r
+\r
+d\r