--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <david@belohrad.ch>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA9D429E28\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 4 Sep 2013 02:50:15 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+ autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id 1RuTiAZ6VuMC for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Wed, 4 Sep 2013 02:50:10 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from server.belohrad.ch (static-212-101-19-163.adsl.solnet.ch\r
+ [212.101.19.163])\r
+ (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53635431FDA\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 4 Sep 2013 02:50:10 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from beesknees.cern.ch.belohrad.ch (beesknees.cern.ch\r
+ [137.138.197.99])\r
+ (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: david)\r
+ by server.belohrad.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 63EEB2C0055;\r
+ Wed, 4 Sep 2013 11:50:23 +0200 (CEST)\r
+From: David Belohrad <david@belohrad.ch>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>,\r
+ notmuch mailing list <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: proposal to remove contrib/notmuch-vim and\r
+ contrib/notmuch-deliver\r
+In-Reply-To: <87ioygrkhj.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+References: <87ioygrkhj.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+73~g1c450ec (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 11:50:05 +0200\r
+Message-ID: <uaxa9jsncfm.fsf@beesknees.cern.ch>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 09:50:15 -0000\r
+\r
+is actually someone using notmuch deliver? i was thinking to use is as\r
+my 'implementation' of emailing uses remote access via SSH. This one is\r
+considerably slower (especially when slow uplink) than local access and\r
+hence if notmuch-deliver would be in a shape, that would spare at least\r
+some time when 'notmuch new' is invoked from remote.\r
+\r
+i agree however that 'notmuch new' could be scheduled at some interval,\r
+notmuch-deliver would be much clearer solution.\r
+\r
+.d.\r
+\r
+\r
+David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:\r
+\r
+> Hi;\r
+>\r
+> Both are superceded by code in the main tree, and should probably not be\r
+> shipped in the next release. I suppose there are some packagers\r
+> packaging contrib/notmuch-deliver, but they will have to adapt at some\r
+> point anyway. \r
+>\r
+> Comments?\r
+>\r
+> d\r
+> _______________________________________________\r
+> notmuch mailing list\r
+> notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch\r