--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F11D6DE02BF\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 06:16:54 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.019\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.019 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[AWL=-0.008, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01]\r
+ autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id LdUC1y_E9YC9 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Sun, 10 Apr 2016 06:16:45 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEC2E6DE00BD\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 06:16:45 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84)\r
+ (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+ id 1apFER-0002ak-Cj; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 09:16:51 -0400\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 21571 invoked by uid 1000);\r
+ Sun, 10 Apr 2016 13:16:40 -0000\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>,\r
+ Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: thread merge/split proposal\r
+In-Reply-To: <87k2kdutao.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>\r
+References: <87mvp9uwi4.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>\r
+ <87k2kdutao.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+99~gd93d377 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 10:16:40 -0300\r
+Message-ID: <878u0l8uyv.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 13:16:54 -0000\r
+\r
+Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> writes:\r
+\r
+> for (1) i'd propose that the join operation would be implemented by\r
+> adding a new term type "join", which can be applied to any document.\r
+> Its value is the message-id of a message that *should* be "in-reply-to"\r
+> but wasn't.\r
+\r
+Having "split" terms or equivalently "signed" +-reference terms would\r
+allow more general thread splitting, effectively updating (via a little\r
+journal of additions and deletions) the references data stored in mail\r
+file.\r
+\r
+The implementation cost could not be that much higher than only\r
+join/unjoin; a bit more work managing the terms attached to a document\r
+to avoid contradictions.\r
+\r
+Both versions probably complicate some peoples syncing solutions.\r
+\r
+d\r
+\r
+\r
+\r
+\r