--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0111F6DE0352\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:39:40 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.176\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.176 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[AWL=-0.109, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,\r
+ RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01,\r
+ RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]\r
+ autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id 6Vi0B7-tQdtc for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:39:32 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com (mail-wm0-f53.google.com\r
+ [74.125.82.53]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9F846DE02D7 for\r
+ <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:39:31 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by mail-wm0-f53.google.com with SMTP id v188so74495148wme.1\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:39:31 -0700 (PDT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+ d=dme-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;\r
+ h=to:subject:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:mime-version;\r
+ bh=RtwgletXmC1CMcjoKvqJrFe9oOqCOX3PvxYC/ovRvZM=;\r
+ b=jSxFO2CQDuQrTlwd2rKCZEY3aARRlLDUBsZNtEJDMF6tmF4t2haOy1341SojTUB9pz\r
+ Cmo04DwqzFsHyEMnzM1POQBfKelGtA2mUhvfMBoNXtGy3ss+paKg94HcEgtrgb+Y2nOa\r
+ I9MLr4Rw0Xkpo8kHlbuLafQCNqKRjDDSFOmj4LfayFGcmR6LG/4VHlYt1+0nOAX9+57z\r
+ pivrBc6lm9zmNW6q8JiXqcZfgKsj8PSjdgoj9sGDggccHZUIBwaLe/komgjsgZAzpfFQ\r
+ Lqilf38GUZkQ49ZyTJ3OvmHYLqyd/eQDKaVwMxq6DaHDdv7ig/DeJwh/WYkzQWKKawO/\r
+ p5uA==\r
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+ d=1e100.net; s=20130820;\r
+ h=x-gm-message-state:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:from:date\r
+ :message-id:mime-version;\r
+ bh=RtwgletXmC1CMcjoKvqJrFe9oOqCOX3PvxYC/ovRvZM=;\r
+ b=REZo70RU7d/vUOyhihA7dR5L1chVF8V8EjLb96an9skL0EHwnC2WxA7MvQB2xB4zDk\r
+ tSjqgMbVUS7x99qJsq/Fd1PcmE5p+ztUlbdZOQs6yRUwFrSGMvBtY8b+hkHr7Q1Aa4Dh\r
+ Cg/Rd+rvP8PI4DIH6F9C2h3fSFu6kgfWuks5g1OOB5k5NtICm7X1J8MCdQ+TSsS4tBag\r
+ zu5Bk43c3nqzSnLn0p/e9s19zwsh0yHB8u3BVU0QZxhTO5xeLsDKd4dNkgv2HwxG4Snb\r
+ VvD34Y+WO5nHDY7QIVDniHPKHDZER8QbDjpAheKFYr5CEHpqwBzawYW8ch6qb00jFEud\r
+ u0bA==\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ AD7BkJKoCcwAlM5opniE6ti2LJgrqhyWz2Kz/aTDHhjiqNHXoiq7StUkIUPvGnK491EDKw==\r
+X-Received: by 10.194.138.37 with SMTP id qn5mr22265859wjb.108.1460360370384; \r
+ Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:39:30 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from disaster-area.hh.sledj.net\r
+ ([2a01:348:1a2:1:ea39:35ff:fe2c:a227])\r
+ by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 7sm15876776wmn.7.2016.04.11.00.39.28\r
+ (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);\r
+ Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:39:29 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost (disaster-area.hh.sledj.net [local])\r
+ by disaster-area.hh.sledj.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id aa9a0bbb;\r
+ Mon, 11 Apr 2016 07:39:28 +0000 (UTC)\r
+To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>,\r
+ David Bremner <david@tethera.net>,\r
+ Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>,David Mazieres expires 2016-07-03\r
+ PDT <mazieres-297ctmng4fhr6h6ad8yffa64yi@temporary-address.scs.stanford.edu>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: Breaking a really long thread\r
+In-Reply-To: <87y48kipdw.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+References: <c10e501c2baee471cbeeb42aad89a1e966407234-NM@bruno.deptj.eu>\r
+ <87k2kd8r6d.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> <87wpoc7hf8.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu>\r
+ <8760vrm3jk.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> <87fuuu3938.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+ <87bn5ijthh.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> <87oa9g7vd6.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+ <87y48kipdw.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>\r
+Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 08:39:27 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <m2y48kmw5s.fsf@dme.org>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 07:39:40 -0000\r
+\r
+On Mon, Apr 11 2016, Mark Walters wrote:\r
+> On Mon, 11 Apr 2016, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
+>> Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> writes:\r
+>>\r
+>>> I think we already have this, except it is called\r
+>>> notmuch-mua-hidden-headers. It defaults to '("^User-Agent:").\r
+>>>\r
+>>> I think it would be reasonable to add In-Reply-To to this list.\r
+>>>\r
+>>> However, if I read the code correctly, currently we are changing\r
+>>> message-hidden-headers globally which doesn't feel the right thing to\r
+>>> do. Probably we should do something more like you suggest, and do the\r
+>>> overriding just in notmuch-message-mode.\r
+>>>\r
+>>\r
+>> Summarizing, I see 3 related changes here\r
+>>\r
+>> - fixing the code to let-bind message-hidden-headers instead of globally\r
+>> modify it\r
+>\r
+> I have a patch doing this, but there is one problem that i don't see how\r
+> to solve neatly. At the moment we set hidden-headers to the union of\r
+> message-hidden-headers and notmuch-mua-hidden-headers. This means that\r
+> if the user wants to show a header that is normally one of\r
+> message-hidden-headers they have to set message-hidden-headers (ie they\r
+> can't just change notmuch-mua-hidden headers).\r
+>\r
+> If we want it that people can show such a header just by changing a\r
+> notmuch variable then I don't see how to do it neatly without breaking\r
+> some existing setups.\r
+>\r
+> Any suggestions?\r
+\r
+My inclination is to say "if you want to change the headers that are\r
+hidden in message mode, change `message-hidden-headers'" and don't\r
+bother with any notmuch specific settings.\r
+\r
+That, of course, leads me to wonder why I ever added\r
+`notmuch-mua-hidden-headers' in the first place...\r
+\r
+> Best wishes\r
+>\r
+> Mark\r
+>\r
+>>\r
+>> - adding in-reply-to notmuch-mua\r
+>>\r
+>> - providing a keybinding to toggle visibility of hidden headers that\r
+>> works better than the current use of widen\r
+>>\r
+>> d\r
+> _______________________________________________\r
+> notmuch mailing list\r
+> notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+> https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch\r
projects / notmuch-archives.git / commitdiff