[Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

diff --git a/e0/8021efd93d451f8216187ce3e74d88b2282a72 b/e0/8021efd93d451f8216187ce3e74d88b2282a72
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..5a88c44
--- /dev/null
+++ b/e0/8021efd93d451f8216187ce3e74d88b2282a72
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B27431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 16:48:03 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id e41zcfpEGx9i for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sat, 26 Feb 2011 16:48:03 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from tempo.its.unb.ca (tempo.its.unb.ca [131.202.1.21])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DC07431FB5\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 16:48:03 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from zancas.localnet\r
+       (fctnnbsc30w-142167174034.pppoe-dynamic.High-Speed.nb.bellaliant.net\r
+       [142.167.174.34]) (authenticated bits=0)\r
+       by tempo.its.unb.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p1R0lvV8020811\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);\r
+       Sat, 26 Feb 2011 20:47:58 -0400\r
+Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.72)\r
+       (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+       id 1PtUl9-0006yT-6W; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 20:45:15 -0400\r
+From: David Bremner <bremner@unb.ca>\r
+To: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,\r
+       notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: [Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support\r
+In-Reply-To: <87tygl29vu.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+References: <4CF15D67.1070904@fifthhorseman.net>\r
+       <87aak08fu8.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <87fwsf9mip.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <87tygl29vu.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-101-g43901b8 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 20:45:15 -0400\r
+Message-ID: <87oc5yi9us.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 00:48:03 -0000\r
+\r
+On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:18:45 -0800, Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:\r
+> Hi, all.  I have pushed a new branch called "crypto" to my notmuch\r
+> repository [0].  This branch provides full support for PGP/MIME signed\r
+> and encrypted messages, including emacs UI support.  It has been applied\r
+> on top of cworth's current master (21e97c50).  It includes the\r
+> following:\r
+> \r
+\r
+Further to our discussion on IRC the other day about providing feedback\r
+on patches, I have run these patches pretty much all of February with\r
+no glitches.  I am running them on 3 different machines, although they\r
+are all Debian AMD64 boxes.\r
+\r
+David\r
+\r
+P.S. I also started the (possibly goofy) idea of putting [Review] in the\r
+subject to highlight the fact there is feedback on the patches.\r