Re: encrypting replies to encrypted mail

diff --git a/8f/84d1a32d836c48acd1f8482f2698aada60ae45 b/8f/84d1a32d836c48acd1f8482f2698aada60ae45
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..886ffde
--- /dev/null
+++ b/8f/84d1a32d836c48acd1f8482f2698aada60ae45
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+Return-Path: <fauno@ponape.com.ar>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9288429E35\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 12:06:11 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.1\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 4hlOlYmDVu6C for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sun, 12 Jan 2014 12:06:04 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Greylist: delayed 328 seconds by postgrey-1.32 at olra;\r
+       Sun, 12 Jan 2014 12:06:04 PST\r
+Received: from ponape.com.ar (ponape.com.ar [190.111.232.20])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 568EA429E2F\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 12:06:04 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by ponape.com.ar (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id AC738CA60F; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 17:01:29 -0300 (ART)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kiwwwi.com.ar;\r
+       s=ponape; t=1389556889;\r
+       bh=TYoYpVMdwWG5Ytkm/TA+uXdNgSLvyxKRSm64RwS3fsg=;\r
+       h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date;\r
+       b=Jz5wf2RHNjj2p64En3yHKwX3wZ+Zjeu1ApqmWgaalclyP9Fs9BIDxP0M1r9KXE0EJ\r
+       EucSnYWRPYZg+rnZ5gsc+a6wu37n89BPqMHCS37GvojgNekLrdghfYEkii9b9H21t+\r
+       Bv12ULAHqfKBlMmGYUwoZhY6XfFluDmZSArmSyCE1LPXE4GURkjM+weOKoWeen6Od+\r
+       dJatMi2DymlOVwbgpQMpSPjsMijYPzwHro0neXzKP+G2uSAECbtr61na0kfQ27r9A4\r
+       dfyTsFsXar8Vm3/TIg+ZMpwWIwnKJ/paO0Lypi+Rbz1KGBg0sS3LZdBzk6asVZMdX8\r
+       i2Mkg2dH6XoLw==\r
+From: =?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=A1s?= Reynolds <fauno@kiwwwi.com.ar>\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: encrypting replies to encrypted mail\r
+In-Reply-To: <87a9f1c8aq.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+References: <87a9f1c8aq.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1\r
+       (i686-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Mail-Followup-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 17:01:29 -0300\r
+Message-ID: <87zjn155ra.fsf@endefensadelsl.org>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 20:06:11 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> writes:\r
+\r
+> Hi, folks.  I've been worried for a while about the fact that my notmuch\r
+> mua (notmuch-emacs) does not automatically encrypt replies to encrypted\r
+> messages.  Recently my fears came true when I accidentally sent in the\r
+> clear a reply to an encrypted message that include a full quote of the\r
+> original encrypted text.  This is obviously not ok, to the extent that I\r
+> would like to now consider this a UI bug in notmuch-emacs.\r
+\r
+i solved this by using jl-encrypt.el that asks me if i want to encrypt\r
+an email if the identities i'm writing to are on my keyring :)\r
+\r
+=2D-=20\r
+:{\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJS0vSZAAoJEEVgMtcXpM2cVeAH/0gCAQQM5bDknecRtYDfUPpa\r
+ydVfPEwic0v+IXRYwMKE4c4jwrI2UA/eaEmsjVPvmcb3F3stSUlKwQrOT6xgfcNl\r
+aXK2t0TpE2RvXiKB7rrHWyBYy/WtEa1qeAOyBWZGMyezV3heh5vIk6pTd0KxUxuu\r
+n/ErbuWRFxoBnEuI87wusL4GDfHmN7P8ozwjNxR/B2XlVe05iUnGftN85hQPrktJ\r
+mCGTgKlYdbZR1q9vzSJ7l0yKk8O7zV3w4lW01wdrsz8oR1qeFVOIQ4q5PO3mkR/e\r
+Vgqa8+RXXk/2qbaQRq19z30RAHbwPSzlUCkMO1hhcfq2W0blFfTMeMzH+IisFLw=\r
+=zBxp\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r