cvs-migration document: make the need for "push" more obvious
authorJohannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Wed, 6 Dec 2006 12:27:40 +0000 (13:27 +0100)
committerJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Wed, 6 Dec 2006 17:52:57 +0000 (09:52 -0800)
It really is an important concept to grasp for people coming
from CVS. Even if it is briefly mentioned, it is not obvious
enough to sink in.

[jc: with wording updates from J. Bruce Fields]

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Documentation/cvs-migration.txt

index 6812683a16852ea165dff7dd0582b53138e3f12c..9c2a395e5ac9435f5d42d10837694e2fe13d6c63 100644 (file)
@@ -24,6 +24,11 @@ First, note some ways that git differs from CVS:
     single shared repository which people can synchronize with; see below
     for details.
 
+  * Since every working tree contains a repository, a commit in your
+    private repository will not publish your changes; it will only create
+    a revision. You have to "push" your changes to a public repository to
+    make them visible to others.
+
 Importing a CVS archive
 -----------------------