Re: [Vagrant Cascadian] Bug#759646: notmuch-emacs: switching mode= to invalid value...

diff --git a/da/b0ca3aec19e02a923d50b337429afcde85753a b/da/b0ca3aec19e02a923d50b337429afcde85753a
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..a2ff45c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/da/b0ca3aec19e02a923d50b337429afcde85753a
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1353B431FC0\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 29 Nov 2014 11:10:00 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id CjbJlexgWrJp for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sat, 29 Nov 2014 11:09:51 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C2E7431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 29 Nov 2014 11:09:51 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80)\r
+       (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+       id 1XunOw-00062J-HP; Sat, 29 Nov 2014 15:09:50 -0400\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 19548 invoked by uid 1000); Sat, 29 Nov 2014\r
+       19:09:45 -0000\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org, 759646@bugs.debian.org\r
+Subject: Re: [Vagrant Cascadian] Bug#759646: notmuch-emacs: switching  mode=\r
+       to      invalid value sends unencrypted mail\r
+In-Reply-To: <cunzjbwi36y.fsf@gargravarr.hh.sledj.net>\r
+References: <87lhq7npcw.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <87k35q2zso.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+       <54055C53.40604@fifthhorseman.net>\r
+       <m238caa1rk.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+       <cunzjbwi36y.fsf@gargravarr.hh.sledj.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.19+2~g32855b9 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 20:09:45 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87egsldds6.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 19:10:00 -0000\r
+\r
+David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> writes:\r
+\r
+> On Tue, Sep 02 2014, Tomi Ollila wrote:\r
+>> On Tue, Sep 02 2014, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> wrote:\r
+>>\r
+>>> On 08/30/2014 03:37 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:\r
+>>>> I'm inclined to think this is a bug in message-mode. \r
+>>>\r
+>>> I agree it's a bug in message-mode, not in notmuch itself.\r
+>>\r
+>> I think it might be here:\r
+>>\r
+>> http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/lh/emacs/emacs-24/annotate/head:/lisp/gnus/mml.el#L258\r
+>>\r
+>> (it takes time to load, please wait...)\r
+>>\r
+>> If cond does not match, then don't fail...\r
+>\r
+> This looks to have been fixed in emacs at the end of September 2014.\r
+\r
+Right, this fix was released in emacs 24.4\r
+\r
+I'm a little torn what to do here. On the one hand the upstream change\r
+fixes the bug as reported. On the other hand, if something corrupts the\r
+#secure tag (e.g., by deleting a letter), then the message is still sent\r
+un-uncrypted.\r
+\r
+d\r