Re: Bug#683505: notmuch: FTBFS if built twice in a row: unrepresentable changes to...

diff --git a/92/38de1781394c0b9890444d78f86716593427f5 b/92/38de1781394c0b9890444d78f86716593427f5
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..aafa667
--- /dev/null
+++ b/92/38de1781394c0b9890444d78f86716593427f5
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A170431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  1 Aug 2012 14:38:13 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id cD97IJS5vI+E for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed,  1 Aug 2012 14:38:12 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89F21431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  1 Aug 2012 14:38:12 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from convex-new.cs.unb.ca ([131.202.245.35])\r
+       by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa\r
+       (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72)\r
+       (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+       id 1SwgcD-0002rT-Ht; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 18:38:03 -0300\r
+Received: from bremner by convex-new.cs.unb.ca with local (Exim 4.80)\r
+       (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+       id 1Swgc8-0004nf-0r; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 18:37:56 -0300\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,\r
+ 683505@bugs.debian.org,       Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>\r
+Subject: Re: Bug#683505: notmuch: FTBFS if built twice in a row:\r
+       unrepresentable changes to source\r
+In-Reply-To: <878vdyvdjg.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+References: <20120801103707.GA668@jwilk.net>\r
+       <87pq7aabl8.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca>\r
+       <878vdyvdjg.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 18:37:55 -0300\r
+Message-ID: <87ipd29tu4.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Spam_bar: -\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 21:38:13 -0000\r
+\r
+Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> writes:\r
+\r
+> If a test is failing shouldn't the package build fail as well?  That\r
+> sounds like the real issue to me.\r
+\r
+As I mentioned on IRC, the test only fails on the Debian build machines\r
+(building in a clean chroot using sbuild is not enough) so it isn't\r
+really clear how to duplicate the it. Perhaps building in a clean\r
+virtual machine without networking would do it.  For which tests fail,\r
+see\r
+\r
+https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=notmuch&arch=i386&ver=0.13.2-1&stamp=1338740444\r
+\r
+I think the first things to fail are emacs tests. At a wild guess, it\r
+looks like all of the failing tests are related to emacs.\r
+\r
+I don't think failing the build is the right thing to do, since there\r
+does not actually seem to be anything wrong with the resulting\r
+packages. So removing them from Debian because of some problems with\r
+running the test suite seems a bit extreme.  People not using\r
+notmuch-emacs would probably be especially annoyed ;).\r
+\r
+d\r