Re: [PATCH] lib: Add a new prefix "list" to the search-terms syntax
authorAlexey I. Froloff <raorn@raorn.name>
Tue, 9 Apr 2013 08:30:10 +0000 (12:30 +0400)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:54:18 +0000 (09:54 -0800)
72/3f285f4259a766700e302ab2ebb22c090dd54c [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/72/3f285f4259a766700e302ab2ebb22c090dd54c b/72/3f285f4259a766700e302ab2ebb22c090dd54c
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..3d9d01c
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+Return-Path: <raorn@raorn.name>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F025431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  9 Apr 2013 01:30:14 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.363\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.363 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.363] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 8DjUPgedxLKh for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue,  9 Apr 2013 01:30:12 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail.raorn.name (c2-81-23-10-117.elastic.cloud.croc.ru\r
+       [81.23.10.117])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E442431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  9 Apr 2013 01:30:12 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by mail.raorn.name (Postfix, from userid 500)\r
+       id 160E819A; Tue,  9 Apr 2013 12:30:10 +0400 (MSK)\r
+Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:30:10 +0400\r
+From: "Alexey I. Froloff" <raorn@raorn.name>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: Add a new prefix "list" to the search-terms syntax\r
+Message-ID: <20130409083010.GA27675@raorn.name>\r
+References: <1364996763-19718-1-git-send-email-raorn@raorn.name>\r
+       <874nfjj2lo.fsf@zancas.localnet> <20130408100336.GA1806@raorn.name>\r
+       <877gkchek5.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;\r
+       protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="huq684BweRXVnRxX"\r
+Content-Disposition: inline\r
+In-Reply-To: <877gkchek5.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-12-30)\r
+X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 03:00:50 -0700\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 08:30:14 -0000\r
+\r
+\r
+--huq684BweRXVnRxX\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+Content-Disposition: inline\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 06:56:26PM -0300, David Bremner wrote:\r
+> Sure, no blame attaches. But somebody still needs to fix the patch or\r
+> convince us it doesn't need fixing.=20\r
+\r
+According to git grep -C2 _notmuch_message_gen_terms, there are\r
+seven calls to this function.  Returned status checked zero\r
+times :-)\r
+\r
+> >  Personally I see no reason in indexing list description.\r
+> That's an independent question.  I guess there is the question of how\r
+> much overhead this introduces into=20\r
+\r
+In general, one or six unique descriptions per list (wild guess\r
+based on observation on my several long-running lists).\r
+Depending on list age and list administrator sanity.  Indexing\r
+names for From/To/Cc fields brings bigger overhead, I guess.\r
+\r
+--=20\r
+Regards,    --\r
+Sir Raorn.   --- http://thousandsofhate.blogspot.com/\r
+\r
+--huq684BweRXVnRxX\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"\r
+Content-Description: Digital signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRY9GPAAoJEBd6rh2Yq9FrBzUIAJ4abNT6POQzL5+zwuTKF8Ju\r
+NgriRqwSugw7Yo73FB5LWl4r83w6IeWx7dnNpQIEKu+cySjDtHGy9U787dXzWJ1V\r
+y8FCtbBXGri4JwRwqrdadSoJRWWRc24/9TFfQVeLVMZDC9BAyg9GXm/ImaqU5xqm\r
+bKfLAvbnManR3n5Yos9EolAkRq5Vw17uWul8s3EGRXGw5lpQmLBIP/JeoAML/XHh\r
+J6QO6bb+NtP280BgIDWCFIliOnQL5wrB/OWG32rhJNjblFZ9QwUUtZ0i1QwFDduO\r
+SaOsMQRrMjaGMVHE3EhukjhoZ2ri0VypyrNfodNTKGrWzeHWZVI8N+wmQAfTIBE=\r
+=ziui\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+\r
+--huq684BweRXVnRxX--\r