Re: [PATCH] test: initial tests for smime

diff --git a/b0/e52e23916daa18b61b249cdc3db12db9a5ce5d b/b0/e52e23916daa18b61b249cdc3db12db9a5ce5d
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..cb7c754
--- /dev/null
+++ b/b0/e52e23916daa18b61b249cdc3db12db9a5ce5d
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61093431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 14:00:09 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.138\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.138 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=2.438, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 1dxroP8RRRxl for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sat, 17 Jan 2015 14:00:06 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16A68431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 14:00:06 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from smtp02.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by filter-return (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4646C0318;\r
+       Sat, 17 Jan 2015 14:00:05 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on smtp02.caltech.edu by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from finestructure.net (cpe-104-173-172-86.socal.res.rr.com\r
+       [104.173.172.86])\r
+       (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
+       by smtp-server.its.caltech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2AF706C03B3;\r
+       Sat, 17 Jan 2015 14:00:05 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id E2C4360142; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 14:00:04 -0800 (PST)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, David Bremner <david@tethera.net>,\r
+       Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: initial tests for smime\r
+In-Reply-To: <1421530691-14060-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net>\r
+References: <87wq4ltbma.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <1421530691-14060-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.19+28~g3915564 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 13:59:59 -0800\r
+Message-ID: <87twzpt6e8.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 22:00:09 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+\r
+On Sat, Jan 17 2015, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
+> It was kindof my fault: my original script add embedded ^M's in it, but\r
+> this "cleverness" was messed up somewhere in the patch process.\r
+>\r
+> Does this version work for you?\r
+\r
+For some reason PATCH 3/4 no longer applies after substituting in this\r
+patch as PATCH 1/4.\r
+\r
+But do we really need to test the message output of openssl?  It seems\r
+like it's broken, and if it ever gets fixed we'll need to change this\r
+test.  But all we really care about is that openssl is properly\r
+verifying the message, yes?  Why not just test that and forget about the\r
+rest of openssl's output?\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUuttfAAoJEO00zqvie6q8YrkQAI3q6BZ8y1Ys796LY/E4gL+T\r
+IkInSp6iV1//YzsscBYUmXmbY0tAAxMBUsB0RNJHJLLldW81ndB4kcDUq+R7rhGE\r
+BdOTDnnEkPbl8TDGXo6M4w+lTzIt1BddDdNXvTMJ8GMclQBdARlW0SOYVzDsDpuS\r
+0U0x6OW2qq+0KFt23iBpdUQXHgXJdzVFb1jPcm6NhQrYFOLV26OqdifRZUrjuiDA\r
+Rs8N5rBXbLpZGh1xuaw1idl4c2220LNtrTsFVFAPRRcWHsgpOZBwxn7CRAyix8u0\r
++ryQfVVZjjUv5WQYAr9dkeoozjemhNjVlp+g3EMmy5owGjnUIiy38VxngnBrBRTu\r
+KvxpuPDFhHzXTzOsuJjFO2kYPb8N18vHcofFGB/r3jCG80jlS7JgimSuaVg7QzWr\r
+UaCHct3W3FGqv+NMG75mgdK2ZWKZYjNA9rJuu8tElzjINMM8N9KCWW3BHtyVZAk/\r
+Ut3YJ/LTsIcaKJp/MqTLxgYhLziIiHtkQuMee/Rqwc+M31Tvmi6Il/Qit7vtOEkn\r
+EtXIFFP1HQiZeYpL0TQkuWQ4KGrevulVIoZBFZi2Rfuw6dQpcO8ka4dxpEHkS4Is\r
+7w8USdrycWVPyxE2NZWbf6B3ozoq/JpVSQbkUovHLU8+a5wdSb2wzWW6QnvZ8azS\r
+gelU7iOZIKE/js+9bqnk\r
+=YFGe\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r