Re: RFC: User-Agent header
authorJameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:16:54 +0000 (09:16 +2000)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:36:34 +0000 (09:36 -0800)
e3/6c56b7c6db8bce3688ac85e314e4f42e9e93d6 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/e3/6c56b7c6db8bce3688ac85e314e4f42e9e93d6 b/e3/6c56b7c6db8bce3688ac85e314e4f42e9e93d6
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..ee3f44f
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D3E44196F2\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 06:16:59 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -4.19\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.19 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01]\r
+       autolearn=unavailable\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id IX3esldk-z1R for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sat, 10 Apr 2010 06:16:59 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from serrano.cc.columbia.edu (serrano.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.6])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1364F431FC1\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 06:16:59 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from servo.finestructure.net (cpe-72-227-128-66.nyc.res.rr.com\r
+       [72.227.128.66])\r
+       (user=jgr2110 author=jrollins@finestructure.net mech=PLAIN bits=0)\r
+       by serrano.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o3ADGtAu006576\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);\r
+       Sat, 10 Apr 2010 09:16:55 -0400 (EDT)\r
+Received: from jrollins by servo.finestructure.net with local (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <jrollins@finestructure.net>)\r
+       id 1O0aYR-0000on-Mi; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 09:16:55 -0400\r
+From: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@infradead.org>,\r
+       Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>, Notmuch list\r
+       <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: RFC: User-Agent header\r
+In-Reply-To: <874ojkf23u.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+References: <87iq821hba.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <m3r5mqgeq8.fsf@x200.gr8dns.org>\r
+       <874ojkf23u.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 09:16:54 -0400\r
+Message-ID: <87iq7z8n21.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-No-Spam-Score: Local\r
+X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.6\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:16:59 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 19:55:17 -0700, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:\r
+> So I propose something like:\r
+>=20\r
+>   User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (gnu/linu=\r
+x)\r
+\r
+The problem I see is that if we go with this proposal, our mail will\r
+have inconsistent User-Agent: header, depending on if the message was\r
+new or if it's a reply.  Maybe that's not too big of an issue, though,\r
+since the in the reply case notmuch is generating some of the headers,\r
+whereas they're all generated by emacs in the new message case.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLwHpHAAoJEO00zqvie6q8rMAQAIQsdp9QdJx1DKGFc5Pnsjiz\r
+Y4yKxYmgktK9x2nmbUpWqdRrs2vzB86CITWv+JvdxcJfAAyBqLc30wtDPrJonMl+\r
+gAmcWPOe5padGja9PdSJ+vvla1SmfSBS7UfcwV0BhtGd7tfcvPKiBazix86/IZ1c\r
+tDbDenkqiH9psgX7DVCcelp+ajEy90IBdgV0WPNmu2m+4WsdEUhlfXGg/Zb5rtwS\r
+/POhxt+4Vm/xkqDjpDziaAbfaD29R3Sp6M5AveOe7rSWzzkC/0D21y4sG3creJZ1\r
+E67jrcwT1Z6NB8nNuaUPwG8UBc4sIwSwKoaOLbKVQKs3wWG1l6nczYI6d5pY+wnk\r
+jmiaUlRrEOyRVUC2TRf+V1ogcns/VfoL/ia9P8wCcKIaLn+z4A9n7p5p99UttE36\r
+n0tlOYaAxYjFPbC5zzyNmxuqpt0gFoJ17yrNJBdpvNwfibl8hqr80OMipsYi73J/\r
+is1lSzJT0xhtBBbVr8ZzGFH3ZWJEGtexFB0ZImNVipswgIPisZY8yYIHnBtNq8aY\r
+pdt8MrI2ZquOIdUz54XBkGwJ56IhmFmKORGLIU05UTyqVuq0gt4NbHc9gfvu87YM\r
+kxRECGA9zYg1FQQdJf8HBMHsKdPtV9b9OMUQ1vlVbLGQcaP2IvspjdnMPoyzjY9K\r
+ZQ87spOiHXZKNKEFigb6\r
+=Sj0W\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r