Re: No love for MacPorts?

diff --git a/f8/918773078d10344f5ed18dd037249db78a333e b/f8/918773078d10344f5ed18dd037249db78a333e
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..723f7df
--- /dev/null
+++ b/f8/918773078d10344f5ed18dd037249db78a333e
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB828431FC7\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  4 Feb 2015 21:23:16 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 2.438\r
+X-Spam-Level: **\r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=2.438] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id dJxhjXk-NgxD for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed,  4 Feb 2015 21:23:13 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com (gitolite.debian.net\r
+       [87.98.215.224])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4C8C431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  4 Feb 2015 21:23:13 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from remotemail by mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com with local (Exim\r
+       4.80) (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>) id 1YJEtu-0005hB-Kk\r
+       for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 05:22:51 +0000\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 16332 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 05 Feb 2015\r
+       05:22:37 -0000\r
+Resent-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Resent-From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 06:22:37 +0100\r
+Resent-Message-ID: <87bnl9szj6.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+Received: from gitolite.debian.net ([87.98.215.224]\r
+       helo=mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com) by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtps\r
+       (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from\r
+       <david@tethera.net>) id 1YJ7A9-0004rW-QN for\r
+       bremner-copies@tesseract.cs.unb.ca; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 17:07:06 -0400\r
+Received: from remotemail by mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com with local (Exim\r
+       4.80) (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>) id 1YJ78z-0004JB-Ty;\r
+       Wed, 04 Feb 2015 21:05:53 +0000\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 10468 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 04 Feb 2015\r
+       21:05:40 -0000\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Jinwoo Lee <jinwoo68@gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: No love for MacPorts?\r
+In-Reply-To: <yq65k2zxl7eg.fsf@jinwoo-macbookair.roam.corp.google.com>\r
+References: <yq65k2zxl7eg.fsf@jinwoo-macbookair.roam.corp.google.com>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.19+48~gb74ed1c (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 22:05:40 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87iofhtmjf.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-Spam_bar: ++\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 05:23:17 -0000\r
+\r
+Jinwoo Lee <jinwoo68@gmail.com> writes:\r
+\r
+> I'm using the MacPorts version of notmuch.  And I notice that it's\r
+> stuck with 0.18.1.  It looks like 0.18.2 was released in October and\r
+> 0.19 in November.  Are we not maintaining MacPorts anymore?\r
+>\r
+\r
+We, upstream, have never maintained macports. I don't know if it would\r
+help to keep some metadata upstream like we do for debian and fedora,\r
+but we could certainly discuss it. FWIW, the fedora packaging upstream\r
+in notmuch has not seen a commit for 18 months, so I don't know how up t\r
+to date that is either.\r
+\r