Re: tag:deleted messages immediately deleted ?

diff --git a/77/cd8c013b5e454273dee96e124bdc199686c24f b/77/cd8c013b5e454273dee96e124bdc199686c24f
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..fcd5f01
--- /dev/null
+++ b/77/cd8c013b5e454273dee96e124bdc199686c24f
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB12431FC3\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:39:00 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id oGq3ssGSM6Iv for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:38:52 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52AD2431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:38:52 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80)\r
+       (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+       id 1XtL0f-00088U-BJ; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 14:38:45 -0400\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 13219 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 25 Nov 2014\r
+       18:38:39 -0000\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Olivier Berger <olivier.berger@telecom-sudparis.eu>\r
+Subject: Re: tag:deleted messages immediately deleted ?\r
+In-Reply-To: <87d28gd703.fsf@inf-11879.int-evry.fr>\r
+References: <877fyseuq8.fsf@inf-11879.int-evry.fr>\r
+       <87d28ku7rt.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+       <871tp0ek8b.fsf@inf-11879.int-evry.fr>\r
+       <87lhn8fmq9.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+       <877fypre49.fsf@inf-11879.int-evry.fr>\r
+       <87r3wx9eaq.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+       <87d28gd703.fsf@inf-11879.int-evry.fr>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.19+2~g32855b9 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 19:38:39 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87y4qz86s0.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 18:39:00 -0000\r
+\r
+Olivier Berger <olivier.berger@telecom-sudparis.eu> writes:\r
+\r
+>\r
+> In any case, there has been a change in the way this worked.\r
+\r
+That's strange, but since it is currently working as we expect, the main\r
+question is whether we should change how excludes work.\r
+\r
+>\r
+> For the moment, I'm using the following saved search :\r
+>     (tag:deleted or tag:spam) and tag:deleted\r
+> which will display the deleted mails.\r
+\r
+Right. For me it would be less confusing to write\r
+\r
+       (tag:deleted and tag:spam) or tag:deleted\r
+\r
+I agree that the interaction of excludes makes (either version of ) this\r
+search look a bit strange.\r
+\r