Re:

diff --git a/68/b8aee66c734a8ef3099c7c22f9f48508a064ef b/68/b8aee66c734a8ef3099c7c22f9f48508a064ef
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..06b8845
--- /dev/null
+++ b/68/b8aee66c734a8ef3099c7c22f9f48508a064ef
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD9AC431FBF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:57:08 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.098\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+       NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id khmwNorN9EDV for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:57:04 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3235431FBD\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:57:03 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])\r
+       by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1W8HaV-0004q4-Us; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 22:57:00 +0000\r
+Received: from 93-97-24-31.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.24.31] helo=localhost)\r
+       by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1W8HZc-0003Dn-ND; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 22:56:04 +0000\r
+From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re:\r
+In-Reply-To: <1390925558-15873-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net>\r
+References: <87vbxfkdex.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+       <1390925558-15873-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+484~gfb59956 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 22:54:39 +0000\r
+Message-ID: <87fvo7btu8.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Sender-Host-Address: 93.97.24.31\r
+X-QM-Geographic: According to ripencc,\r
+       this message was delivered by a machine in Britain (UK) (GB).\r
+X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record.  :)\r
+X-QM-Body-MD5: 654fafdb6bbc66aab243df9613513430 (of first 20000 bytes)\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Score: 0.0\r
+X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: /\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to\r
+       determine if it is\r
+       spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.\r
+       This message scored 0.0 points. Summary of the scoring: \r
+       * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail\r
+       provider *      (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)\r
+       *  0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list\r
+X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 22:57:08 -0000\r
+\r
+\r
+Hi\r
+\r
+I have been playing with this. One thing that is worrying me a little at\r
+the moment is that the man page looks different from before (imo less\r
+nice). More importantly, I can't tweak the rst to get the generated\r
+pages to look like the current ones (this could just be my lack of skill\r
+with rst)\r
+\r
+I do like the general approach but would like to make sure we can get\r
+manpages (amongst other things) that we like from it. See below for one\r
+example which I thought looked less nice\r
+\r
+Best wishes\r
+\r
+Mark\r
+\r
+\r
+\r
+The particular  thing is the indentation for options (eg options in the\r
+notmuch.1 page) In the original pages it looks like\r
+\r
+OPTIONS\r
+       Supported global options for notmuch include\r
+\r
+           --help\r
+\r
+               Print a synopsis of available commands and exit.\r
+\r
+and in the new ones\r
+\r
+OPTIONS\r
+       Supported global options for notmuch include\r
+\r
+       --help\r
+\r
+       Print a synopsis of available commands and exit.\r
+\r
+I find this makes it more difficult to scan the man page quickly.\r
+\r
+\r
+\r
+\r
+\r
+\r
+\r
+On Tue, 28 Jan 2014, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
+> Here's a second try.\r
+>        \r
+>        - less build system cruft\r
+>\r
+>        - integrate into notmuch's build system\r
+>\r
+>        - optionally build the man pages (but not info) using just\r
+>          python-docutils.\r
+>\r
+> No doubt this could use polishing; I'm still looking for feedback on\r
+> the general approach.\r
+> _______________________________________________\r
+> notmuch mailing list\r
+> notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch\r