Re: [PATCH] emacs: remove thread archiving from show-advance function
authorJameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
Fri, 12 Nov 2010 19:52:52 +0000 (14:52 +1900)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:37:28 +0000 (09:37 -0800)
06/eb66c9be941ad259c4a567bb9cce3ad736abcf [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/06/eb66c9be941ad259c4a567bb9cce3ad736abcf b/06/eb66c9be941ad259c4a567bb9cce3ad736abcf
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..d8b72cf
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F8F40DDE7\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:53:09 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -4.19\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.19 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01]\r
+       autolearn=ham\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id WjRaSg6iYrUU for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:52:57 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from serrano.cc.columbia.edu (serrano.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.6])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B592440DDC9\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:52:57 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from servo.finestructure.net (cpe-74-66-82-137.nyc.res.rr.com\r
+       [74.66.82.137])\r
+       (user=jgr2110 author=jrollins@finestructure.net mech=PLAIN bits=0)\r
+       by serrano.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oACJqsHL000097\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);\r
+       Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:52:55 -0500 (EST)\r
+Received: from jrollins by servo.finestructure.net with local (Exim 4.72)\r
+       (envelope-from <jrollins@finestructure.net>)\r
+       id 1PGzg6-0007FQ-Ik; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:52:54 -0500\r
+From: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: remove thread archiving from show-advance function\r
+In-Reply-To: <87eiaqzcst.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net>\r
+References: <87eiaqwmzh.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <87eiaqzcst.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1\r
+       (i486-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:52:52 -0500\r
+Message-ID: <87tyjmiajv.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-No-Spam-Score: Local\r
+X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.6\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 19:53:09 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+\r
+On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:12:18 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:\r
+> Whether space moves to the next thread should be configurable, I\r
+> think. Similarly whether or not it archives the thread. I'm not worried\r
+> about which is the default behaviour.\r
+\r
+Hey, David.  I thought about that, but decided I'd go ahead and submit\r
+this patch to see what kind of reaction it got.  I'm a little surprised\r
+that anyone would actually like the current behavior, but to each their\r
+own!  I'll look into making it a config option when I get the chance.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJM3ZsVAAoJEO00zqvie6q8PtAP/0PpFpxl4L3CGof4DLJ+mBGX\r
+B6s4c8d9d9ZzK3NeCw8bZDoAF0UC2FlUmtWwrgXkw/NeuyiDPfnNRWlzQlrAakgw\r
+7IMC6adac95JRspc77yJn5BVp6tdC8idWB7dG4xb7MUIFOi3ghG+V+lf68gODPOW\r
+GVr5DiXilOlOPvNtmJEiCQqIkdbTq1OmHpdzeZ9+vkunHJecT5KiyOgpsLWZ6CrC\r
+j+km9KYo0h/uhoq0j7EpdYNHwmdHzkJf32XJy5WksLGE4qMczp4wr1WfTufvWGrP\r
+QQ/EYIxYpo4ALm27C5+HEwfIQvt9iZOyVkQtOmRGOzHLFGQmf1qV8jlTv7saBokm\r
+GA86Ml/G0loBeYEE+mb2ipnwn8vv7FDmevi+nTlKP3Yv+82updGXVbgCdSOF6y1w\r
+RWO1wzOFQKwPoHrEcC1s1NmB69JAzsXGW3RmlPd0b5/mScjHpSRyl5bt6dLg8ukL\r
+em+BlRjWkrUxQW8g/PeiugWFqjEw4/kc48rXWYgD2ctzOCW2O5ZpklLsHhvttC5L\r
+SEOvmF/YHgLlW36PEX3+Px69oE4LVeSf9gRrlw/i3Gr0Rw0MjJ9ZeGYXZgLp4C+A\r
+FqgIn3DXnizJhonDzgN3hGFDvZi0eF/8nEO2Q3zCJrJVYwdoJOYHeEP4O0aPOA2b\r
+FWwpUz3WswVd7NYiuA5I\r
+=Z4lc\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r