Re: [PATCH] debian: package ruby bindings

diff --git a/63/ec249d20839b974356e3eea23e86ab29ff12f0 b/63/ec249d20839b974356e3eea23e86ab29ff12f0
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..de71008
--- /dev/null
+++ b/63/ec249d20839b974356e3eea23e86ab29ff12f0
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C272D431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 18:22:34 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 4UIephgL1TO2 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sun, 28 Apr 2013 18:22:34 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4245E431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 18:22:34 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034082078.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net\r
+       ([156.34.82.78] helo=zancas.localnet)\r
+       by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa\r
+       (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80)\r
+       (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+       id 1UWcnV-0002ZJ-4s; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 22:22:29 -0300\r
+Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.80)\r
+       (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+       id 1UWcnP-0006SO-Hc; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 22:22:23 -0300\r
+From: David Bremner <bremner@debian.org>\r
+To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] debian: package ruby bindings\r
+In-Reply-To:\r
+ <CAMP44s3x0m-KUN6aND71SHbBWz6S_23ZcQ-mcT+qxVtEdU+-5w@mail.gmail.com>\r
+References: <1365031678-25188-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
+       <87y5clte1j.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+       <CAMP44s07KeL4uAChs3KFiqwcsCwWTvni6MzFGzXNeO7=sd6U6Q@mail.gmail.com>\r
+       <87wqs4rsjm.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+       <CAMP44s2RuAGjJV089swpjwG9i5X=sARPYve6XZPyK7X7QwZBDg@mail.gmail.com>\r
+       <878v48om5u.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+       <CAMP44s3x0m-KUN6aND71SHbBWz6S_23ZcQ-mcT+qxVtEdU+-5w@mail.gmail.com>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+84~g12d5e4e (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 22:22:23 -0300\r
+Message-ID: <87a9oiw2pc.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-Spam_bar: -\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 01:22:34 -0000\r
+\r
+Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:\r
+>\r
+> I understand that you are not going to work on the Debian packages for\r
+> some time, but what prevents this patch from being merged to notmuch\r
+> 'master'? Is there any problems with the patch? Shall I just push it?\r
+\r
+The Debian packaging in master is the `live' packaging that generates\r
+the packages that are uploaded to Debian. So effectively you are asking\r
+me "Are you willing to upload this package to Debian". I'm not sure\r
+about that yet.  Don't take it personally, there are currently 71\r
+patches in the review queue. More reviews are always welcome ;).\r
+\r
+d\r