Re: notspam: a notmuch interface to spamassassin

diff --git a/a8/2efb1599fe076d33d8a9dc56ab08162ce48902 b/a8/2efb1599fe076d33d8a9dc56ab08162ce48902
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..155d990
--- /dev/null
+++ b/a8/2efb1599fe076d33d8a9dc56ab08162ce48902
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+Return-Path: <np@nicolaspouillard.fr>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C2DA431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  6 Mar 2013 00:26:57 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.001\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id njKZSu2p66Iy for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed,  6 Mar 2013 00:26:56 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEA7F431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  6 Mar 2013 00:26:56 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from fulvetta.riseup.net (fulvetta-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.75])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (Client CN "*.riseup.net",\r
+       Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (not verified))\r
+       by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2E2A503B1;\r
+       Wed,  6 Mar 2013 00:26:55 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       (Authenticated sender: nicolaspouillard@fulvetta.riseup.net)\r
+       with ESMTPSA id DED02885\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+From: Nicolas Pouillard <np@nicolaspouillard.fr>\r
+User-Agent: alot/0.3.4\r
+To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,\r
+       Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+References: <87sj49gha7.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+In-Reply-To: <87sj49gha7.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+Message-ID: <20130306083038.9606.44858@mail-np.tu.ail>\r
+Subject: Re: notspam: a notmuch interface to spamassassin\r
+Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 09:30:38 +0100\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at mx1\r
+X-Virus-Status: Clean\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 08:26:57 -0000\r
+\r
+Quoting Jameson Graef Rollins (2013-03-06 07:43:12)\r
+> Hey, folks.  I put together a little python program as an interface\r
+> between notmuch and spamassassin (sa) that I thought others might be\r
+> interested in:\r
+> =\r
+\r
+> git://finestructure.net/notspam\r
+\r
+Good idea!\r
+\r
+[...]\r
+\r
+> PS: if anyone has any suggestions for Bayesian classifiers better than\r
+> sa I'm all ears.  I'm not so happy with sa at the moment.  It misses a\r
+> lot more spam than I would like.  Maybe I just haven't tweaked it out\r
+> yet, in which case if anyone has any suggestions on how to improve sa's\r
+> classification I'm also all ears.\r
+\r
+As a competitor there is afew [1] which internally uses dbacl.\r
+\r
+As of  other spam  filters per  se, I  know my  previous boss  wrote one\r
+called SpamOracle  [2]. The tool  itself seems  to not see  much changes\r
+these days (2003). I  do not use it myself, however  I know people using\r
+it [3] and its very likely that the software is good enough and does not\r
+need much maintenance.\r
+\r
+Supporting multiple  tools would be great  and having a nice  way to use\r
+several at  the same time  would be  cool... thinking of  your interface\r
+seems  to trivially  support this  by simply  running the  tool multiple\r
+times.\r
+\r
+Best regards,\r
+-- NP\r
+\r
+[1]: https://github.com/teythoon/afew\r
+[2]: http://spamoracle.forge.ocamlcore.org/\r
+[3]: http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=3Dspamoracle\r