Re: priorities for 0.13

diff --git a/e4/221f77133ead3358e0443a86b4f4a8404520d6 b/e4/221f77133ead3358e0443a86b4f4a8404520d6
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..d197f5c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/e4/221f77133ead3358e0443a86b4f4a8404520d6
@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
+Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A51431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 12:50:48 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.098\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+       NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id aif39Qi4jRRG for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sun, 29 Apr 2012 12:50:48 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26117431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 12:50:48 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])\r
+       by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1SOa8m-00074S-Ii; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 20:50:42 +0100\r
+Received: from 94-192-233-223.zone6.bethere.co.uk ([94.192.233.223]\r
+       helo=localhost)\r
+       by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1SOa8m-0007da-5p; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 20:50:40 +0100\r
+From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: priorities for 0.13\r
+In-Reply-To: <87ehr6fhtj.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+References: <878vhkvvqi.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87ehr6fhtj.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+128~g0f26d91 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 20:50:58 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87397m5nbx.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Sender-Host-Address: 94.192.233.223\r
+X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record.  :)\r
+X-QM-Body-MD5: 989a7ffea7fe0bf034b61ab27941433b (of first 20000 bytes)\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8\r
+X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: -\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to\r
+       determine if it is\r
+       spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.\r
+       This message scored -1.8 points.\r
+       Summary of the scoring: \r
+       * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,\r
+       *      medium trust\r
+       *      [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org]\r
+       * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail\r
+       provider *      (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)\r
+       * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay\r
+       *      domain\r
+       *  0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list\r
+X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 19:50:49 -0000\r
+\r
+\r
+On Sun, 29 Apr 2012, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
+> David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:\r
+>\r
+>> Hi All;\r
+>>\r
+>> I'd like to have a feature freeze for 0.13 sometime in the first week of\r
+>> May.  What do people feel are priorities to try to get reviewed and\r
+>> pushed for 0.13?\r
+>>\r
+>\r
+> So here are some patches that people expressed interest in for 0.13, but\r
+> need more review.\r
+>\r
+>      id:"1335056093-17621-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca"\r
+>\r
+>      id:"1334431301-27303-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com"\r
+>\r
+>      id:"1335651473-19652-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu"\r
+>\r
+> Note that in particular it makes sense to push amdragon's changes while\r
+> we are bumping the SONAME.\r
+>         \r
+> The sequence by Jamie\r
+>\r
+>     id:"1334429574-12918-2-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net"\r
+>\r
+> Has only one minor comment about a comment; I'm not sure it's enough for\r
+> a rebase on it's own.  Mark, what do you think?\r
+\r
+Hi\r
+\r
+I think Jamie already posted a patch with a nicer comment \r
+\r
+id:"1334436547-10260-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net"\r
+\r
+(ie that replaces 2/5 in the original series)\r
+\r
+In any case don't let the comment hold everything up: we can correct\r
+that later if we care (and it does not matter to users)\r
+\r
+Best wishes\r
+\r
+Mark\r