Re: [notmuch] Potential problem using Git for mail (was: Idea for storing tags)
authormartin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net>
Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:55:13 +0000 (08:55 +1300)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:35:58 +0000 (09:35 -0800)
cc/ac06882d7a2208b22623068e5daf9a5c778f39 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/cc/ac06882d7a2208b22623068e5daf9a5c778f39 b/cc/ac06882d7a2208b22623068e5daf9a5c778f39
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..7061cf4
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+Return-Path: <madduck@lapse.rw.madduck.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F1F431FBD\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:55:27 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id cHsQHaBGfuqt for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:55:27 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from clegg.madduck.net (clegg.madduck.net [193.242.105.96])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2992A431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:55:27 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from lapse.rw.madduck.net (lapse.nz.madduck.net\r
+       [IPv6:2001:4428:234::1])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (Client CN "lapse.rw.madduck.net",\r
+       Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (verified OK))\r
+       by clegg.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DC1B1D4097;\r
+       Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:55:17 +0100 (CET)\r
+Received: by lapse.rw.madduck.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 50C2E26E2; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 08:55:13 +1300 (NZDT)\r
+Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 08:55:13 +1300\r
+From: martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net>\r
+To: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+Message-ID: <20100112195513.GE13782@lapse.rw.madduck.net>\r
+Mail-Followup-To: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,\r
+       notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+References: <20100111221909.GA30299@lapse.rw.madduck.net>\r
+       <1263267603-sup-302@elise>\r
+       <20100112045152.GA15275@lapse.rw.madduck.net>\r
+       <20100112193833.GM8342@finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;\r
+       protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Rgf3q3z9SdmXC6oT"\r
+Content-Disposition: inline\r
+In-Reply-To: <20100112193833.GM8342@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Motto: Keep the good times rollin'\r
+X-OS: Debian GNU/Linux squeeze/sid kernel 2.6.32-trunk-686 i686\r
+X-Spamtrap: madduck.bogus@madduck.net\r
+X-Subliminal-Message: debian/rules!\r
+User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at clegg\r
+X-Virus-Status: Clean\r
+Cc: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: [notmuch] Potential problem using Git for mail (was: Idea for\r
+ storing tags)\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:55:28 -0000\r
+\r
+\r
+--Rgf3q3z9SdmXC6oT\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+Content-Disposition: inline\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+also sprach Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> [2010.01.13.0838 +=\r
+1300]:\r
+> What about if just the tag information is stored in the\r
+> repository, and not the mail itself?  In that case only the user\r
+> would be pushing into the repo and you wouldn't have to worry\r
+> about the DoS scenario.\r
+\r
+I certainly would like the ability to have messages\r
+automatically-tagged on delivery, by procmail.\r
+\r
+--=20\r
+martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/\r
+=20\r
+may the bluebird of happiness twiddle your bits.\r
+=20\r
+spamtraps: madduck.bogus@madduck.net\r
+\r
+--Rgf3q3z9SdmXC6oT\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="digital_signature_gpg.asc"\r
+Content-Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)\r
+Content-Disposition: inline\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iEYEAREDAAYFAktM06EACgkQIgvIgzMMSnWT1wCeM1rf+/MaeKZYNy7Op1MqCuo/\r
+NRIAnjIDVXNxqdcc9g0zkxgsxNFrXPrZ\r
+=jggm\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+\r
+--Rgf3q3z9SdmXC6oT--\r