Re: [PATCH RFC] Emacs: Add address completion mechanism implemented in elisp

diff --git a/63/93417610ff15112a65c43a89708640c96eff38 b/63/93417610ff15112a65c43a89708640c96eff38
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..8ec1cb8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/63/93417610ff15112a65c43a89708640c96eff38
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+Return-Path: <tjim@mac.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4FA431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:17:03 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.298\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,\r
+       RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id B+6npiaD6cFD for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:16:59 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from st11p02mm-asmtp002.mac.com (st11p02mm-asmtpout002.mac.com\r
+       [17.172.220.237]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA340431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:16:59 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from st11p02mm-spool002.mac.com ([17.172.220.247])\r
+       by st11p02mm-asmtp002.mac.com\r
+       (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.10(7.0.4.27.9) 64bit\r
+       (built Jun\r
+       6 2014)) with ESMTP id <0N9J00851PW2HC50@st11p02mm-asmtp002.mac.com>\r
+       for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 22:16:50 +0000 (GMT)\r
+X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure\r
+       engine=2.50.10432:5.12.52,1.0.14,0.0.0000\r
+       definitions=2014-07-30_07:2014-07-30, 2014-07-30,\r
+       1970-01-01 signatures=0\r
+X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0\r
+       suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam\r
+       adjust=0\r
+       reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1402240000\r
+       definitions=main-1407300249\r
+MIME-version: 1.0\r
+Content-type: multipart/alternative;\r
+       boundary="Boundary_(ID_fd1snLNsrBFF4pN/+0qftg)"\r
+Received: from localhost ([17.172.220.163]) by st11p02mm-spool002.mac.com\r
+       (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.08(7.0.4.27.7) 64bit\r
+       (built Aug\r
+       22 2013)) with ESMTP id <0N9J008OYPW2C860@st11p02mm-spool002.mac.com>;\r
+       Wed, 30 Jul 2014 22:16:50 +0000 (GMT)\r
+To: Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>\r
+From: Trevor Jim <tjim@mac.com>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Emacs: Add address completion\r
+ mechanism implemented in elisp\r
+Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 22:16:50 +0000 (GMT)\r
+X-Mailer: iCloud MailClient14E.142298 MailServer14E24.16380\r
+X-Originating-IP: [128.112.139.195]\r
+Message-id: <472ef380-a3ff-4c3b-b731-c8bb4a32723a@me.com>\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 22:17:04 -0000\r
+\r
+\r
+--Boundary_(ID_fd1snLNsrBFF4pN/+0qftg)\r
+Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed\r
+Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+BTW I have been refactoring my async process code. You might consider it f=\r
+or your patch.=0A-Trevor=0A=EF=BB=BF=0A=\r
+\r
+--Boundary_(ID_fd1snLNsrBFF4pN/+0qftg)\r
+Content-type: multipart/related;\r
+ boundary="Boundary_(ID_Xg7jwbuCXteABKV3ETvA4Q)"; type="text/html"\r
+\r
+\r
+--Boundary_(ID_Xg7jwbuCXteABKV3ETvA4Q)\r
+Content-type: text/html; CHARSET=US-ASCII\r
+Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT\r
+\r
+<html><body><div>BTW I have been refactoring my async process code. You might consider it for your patch.<br>-Trevor<br><br></div></body></html>\r
+\r
+--Boundary_(ID_Xg7jwbuCXteABKV3ETvA4Q)--\r
+\r
+--Boundary_(ID_fd1snLNsrBFF4pN/+0qftg)--\r