--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8966431FB6\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 16 May 2014 04:12:08 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id kQrbgEv4URWM for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Fri, 16 May 2014 04:12:04 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com\r
+ [209.85.212.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 066AF431FAE\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 16 May 2014 04:12:03 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id r20so755219wiv.7\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 16 May 2014 04:12:02 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+ d=1e100.net; s=20130820;\r
+ h=x-gm-message-state:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent\r
+ :from:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;\r
+ bh=DPtk+C9p7iqFmL0jvVQzZekDrMQBWWt6wunnB4VZYmo=;\r
+ b=foHgQhuzkVHZoeztnhrxR9e8omOmO9pKpYK0Fs3EoEWmaCTPmNUUA9AGV+2PP3BRlp\r
+ dHJNFuWl0vQp8JBRt2Pd0rRF8/YVAxDVzx4c2PVoFPF+DrlhQCAeZwR6E3DrA+W7jJz6\r
+ soQ5rWo7v3GPBGozB1n0SOczjkNq852vKCn4o8cqlRnexpmMj6Fd7I7rnUmLfbFNLioi\r
+ hlKHrsLz34aLYJ9ut8iiB22WhPVQBE1KtiqR4VZecConkQJJeoD7hJFHo1ljN69xkjnT\r
+ EvZLVxSBail4IbeMzj5gHfCWpZoyDndVxTBau9nlv1MvP+mlGu4KEb8MoFr/Kqf09Bp2\r
+ N+zA==\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ ALoCoQlzuSQgvDAB6ZwmBddJVXs/5Of/wkzeHHyO/Oqh6dgGm95Q6BXEUQcUyEoQoJtuvf+SwYAT\r
+X-Received: by 10.180.12.238 with SMTP id b14mr13438005wic.16.1400238722325;\r
+ Fri, 16 May 2014 04:12:02 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost ([2a01:348:1a2:1:a288:b4ff:fe8a:77d8])\r
+ by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ho2sm2800973wib.15.2014.05.16.04.12.00\r
+ for <multiple recipients>\r
+ (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);\r
+ Fri, 16 May 2014 04:12:00 -0700 (PDT)\r
+To: Wael Nasreddine <wael.nasreddine@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Enable Travis-CI as a backup continuous\r
+ integration service.\r
+In-Reply-To: <w52c8uq3szyh.fsf@gaea.mtv.corp.google.com>\r
+References: <1400108004-26955-1-git-send-email-wael.nasreddine@gmail.com>\r
+ <1400108004-26955-2-git-send-email-wael.nasreddine@gmail.com>\r
+ <cun1tvv5zi3.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+ <w52c8uq3szyh.fsf@gaea.mtv.corp.google.com>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>\r
+Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 12:11:52 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <cuniop63rlz.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+ micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 11:12:09 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+\r
+On Thu, May 15 2014, Wael Nasreddine wrote:\r
+> It is fragile, but unfortunately there's no way (As far as I know)\r
+> around this problem. Travis-CI is currently running Ubuntu Precise\r
+> (12.04) and they have plans to update to Trusty[0] but it's going to take\r
+> them some time.\r
+\r
+Please forgive my ignorance. What is the place from which you are\r
+grabbing these packages? It doesn't seem to be part of the Ubuntu\r
+repositories. Is there no backports or security-updates repository for\r
+Ubuntu 12.04?\r
+\r
+I'm really asking whether there is a way to use the standard Ubuntu\r
+repositories to get the packages rather than downloading them directly.\r
+\r
+>> - What happens when those are no longer the right version numbers?\r
+> I can host the files in a Github repository if that would work better? I\r
+> am not very concerned about security in this case because Travis runs in\r
+> an isolated disposable VM created for the build and destroyed\r
+> afterwards.\r
+\r
+I have no strong preference. If they aren't coming from the standard\r
+repositories then it's all just slightly different versions of bad :-)\r
+\r
+>> - What happens when those versions are already provided by the standard\r
+>> repository?\r
+>\r
+> When #2046[0] is fixed by the Travis-CI team, our travis.yml will be\r
+> updated to work accordingly.\r
+\r
+Presume that you have lost interest in notmuch. How will we know that\r
+this has happened?\r
+\r
+>> - What happens if travis runs start happening on (say) an arm64 machine?\r
+>\r
+> Travis is currently running amd64[1] and I don't think they have plans\r
+> to change that, in fact I heard that they have plans to support more\r
+> architectures configurable in .travis.yml\r
+\r
+Your two statements seem contradictory here.\r
+\r
+>> I realise that you might answer "I will keep this up to date", but we\r
+>> have to worry about what happens if you lose interest and wander away.\r
+>\r
+> Absolutely, I understand your point and no one can guarantee\r
+> maintainer-ship. I can modify my patch and add documentation (comments\r
+> in the yaml file) about what each flag does, where can you documentation\r
+> about it and of course details about the hack. Would that be helpful?\r
+\r
+Comments explaining the need to grab the packages directly would be the\r
+absolute minimum requirement, I think. Include a pointer to the travis\r
+issue that you mentioned.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1\r
+\r
+iKYEARECAGYFAlN18nhfFIAAAAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl\r
+bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDc1M0Y5NDJDMEExNjc3MDE4OURGMUYyMDY5\r
+RUNEMEFCRjA0OTY1MTYACgkQaezQq/BJZRbmWwCfeHJ1lc20hYbQcEyFwuSxgGXf\r
+xi4AnRjeYXiADpkNC4sJMQhLhgHCaq8g\r
+=dMs9\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r
projects / notmuch-archives.git / commitdiff