--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <aaronecay@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 629A5429E3B\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:31:15 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+ FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id BZCqxB7I+T3P for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:31:14 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-qw0-f53.google.com (mail-qw0-f53.google.com\r
+ [209.85.216.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75D75429E35\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:31:14 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by qadc16 with SMTP id c16so1926372qad.5\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:31:14 -0800 (PST)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
+ h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id\r
+ :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;\r
+ bh=7QgzCsdQu3LmIFFtv9wqzZKeyHdxnNvmuw0O8dVA8/M=;\r
+ b=Gd8x+bjj7GKUUeoEAhBucbhqsmhrz7RYV6EdMCsRrvzwlxq4VtpSoUzEHJWQuflwlE\r
+ B4uF2DEdJD0dijSNWdVfrKnP5cZz9rdcZvzPLNoHc9kHBnZRjpgwfLWnJ+lGd/nT9wei\r
+ WbqkQO1dwNKM3BWodJBPElKd2NaenJ4q46Tb8=\r
+Received: by 10.224.179.137 with SMTP id bq9mr16800638qab.53.1326753073966;\r
+ Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:31:13 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from localhost (vpl458.wlan.library.upenn.edu. [130.91.141.203])\r
+ by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q14sm39546599qap.4.2012.01.16.14.31.12\r
+ (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
+ Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:31:13 -0800 (PST)\r
+From: Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com>\r
+To: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, Adam Wolfe Gordon <awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>,\r
+ notmuch@notmuchmail.org, awg@xvx.ca\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Quoting HTML-only emails in replies redux\r
+In-Reply-To: <cunsjjg59dp.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+References: <1326009162-19524-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>\r
+ <cun4nvx71uk.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+ <m239bgcd1d.fsf@gmail.com>\r
+ <cunsjjg59dp.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+62~ge41b0d3 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.0.92.1\r
+ (i386-apple-darwin10.8.0)\r
+Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:31:11 -0500\r
+Message-ID: <m2mx9nb7ps.fsf@gmail.com>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:31:15 -0000\r
+\r
+On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 08:39:30 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:\r
+> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 02:38:38 -0500, Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com> wrot=\r
+e:\r
+> > - Greater flexibility in the construction of address lists. For exampl=\r
+e,\r
+> > there are some email lists where I want replies to list mail to go on=\r
+ly\r
+> > to the list, not also to the original sender.\r
+>=20\r
+> Is there a mechanistic way to determine the correct behaviour in this\r
+> respect? I suspect that it's exactly the kind of thing that Carl wanted\r
+> to be included in 'notmuch' itself, so that other UIs can benefit.\r
+\r
+I think it requires some amount of configuration, but it can be done\r
+sensibly. I am much more proficient with Elisp than with C, and\r
+Emacs has prejudiced me towards solutions that allow me to have a\r
+Turing-complete configuration language. :)\r
+\r
+I think a good starting point for thinking about mailing lists is what\r
+Mutt does:\r
+http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-4.html#using_lists\r
+\r
+Notmuch at the CLI/C code level could aim for a comparable level of\r
+expressiveness, and I think it would suffice for most people (including\r
+me).\r
+\r
+[...]\r
+>=20\r
+> You can do both of these things today using `message-send-hook' (I\r
+> do).\r
+\r
+I avoided that, as it seemed to me that just before the message is sent\r
+is too late to be doing these things (I=E2=80=99d like to see confirmation =\r
+when\r
+writing the message that the address/signature changes were applied\r
+correctly). But =E2=80=9CM-x apropos RET message hook RET=E2=80=9D shows t=\r
+hat there are\r
+some earlier points to hook into as well. Thanks.\r
+\r
+> I dislike supercite, so no support from me in that direction :-)\r
+\r
+One advantage of supercite is that it allows non-English speakers to set\r
+up the =E2=80=9COn X, X wrote=E2=80=9D line as they prefer. Notmuch=E2=80=\r
+=99s current approach\r
+(a hard-coded C string) is the opposite of internationalized. So it\r
+would be nice to support some customization of that as well, even if we\r
+don=E2=80=99t go the supercite route.\r
+\r
+--=20\r
+Aaron Ecay\r