Re: v3 of sphinx docs

diff --git a/37/c59d60804ce233447d287e34a8674a8e69ae0d b/37/c59d60804ce233447d287e34a8674a8e69ae0d
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..2c6b0f7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/37/c59d60804ce233447d287e34a8674a8e69ae0d
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D639431FD9\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 16:54:47 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.098\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+       NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 4WpCm433KTEd for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sun, 23 Feb 2014 16:54:42 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07C05431FCF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 16:54:42 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])\r
+       by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1WHjoV-0005Pd-Lw; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 00:54:35 +0000\r
+Received: from 93-97-24-31.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.24.31] helo=localhost)\r
+       by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1WHjoV-0007aL-9v; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 00:54:31 +0000\r
+From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: v3 of sphinx docs\r
+In-Reply-To: <1393114575-8756-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net>\r
+References: <87fvo7btu8.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+       <1393114575-8756-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+562~g339f306 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 00:54:29 +0000\r
+Message-ID: <87r46t49fe.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Sender-Host-Address: 93.97.24.31\r
+X-QM-Geographic: According to ripencc,\r
+       this message was delivered by a machine in Britain (UK) (GB).\r
+X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record.  :)\r
+X-QM-Body-MD5: 09cf700407c068d9a68c84da68427938 (of first 20000 bytes)\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Score: 0.0\r
+X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: /\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to\r
+       determine if it is\r
+       spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.\r
+       This message scored 0.0 points. Summary of the scoring: \r
+       * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail\r
+       provider *      (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)\r
+       *  0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list\r
+X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 00:54:47 -0000\r
+\r
+\r
+This looks good to me. It will obviously need a little tweaking but I\r
+like it.\r
+\r
+There is some error in the conversion for SYNOPSIS for dump, restore\r
+and tag (which may also have caused the problem for compact?)\r
+\r
+Otherwise there were a small number of oddities in indentation, and a\r
+general reduction in boldness (using underlining instead). (This is on a\r
+standard xterm). One case we might care a little about is the SEE ALSO\r
+section at the end where the underlining rather than bold seems\r
+inconsistent with the rest of my debian manpages.\r
+\r
+Best wishes\r
+\r
+Mark\r
+\r
+\r
+\r
+\r
+On Sun, 23 Feb 2014, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
+> This version includes a complete conversion of the existing manpages.\r
+> The conversion uses doclifter + custom python code + pandoc. It is\r
+> pretty much fully automated, so I can rebase against changes to the\r
+> nroff source if needed.  \r
+>\r
+> On the other hand, it is fully automated, so there are bound to be a\r
+> few rough spots. If there are systematic things, I can fix the\r
+> conversion scripts; one offs can just be added to the series.\r
+>\r
+> It does do a much better job of option indentation than the previous\r
+> version.\r
+>\r
+> I think this is reaching the point where if anybody has any strong\r
+> objections to sphinx (with a fallback to rst2man) for the docs, I'd\r
+> like to hear them.\r
+>\r
+> _______________________________________________\r
+> notmuch mailing list\r
+> notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch\r