Re: [PATCH] test: optionally print subtest number

diff --git a/98/f54c3d6198fe96105cb7504ec40a72400fb6db b/98/f54c3d6198fe96105cb7504ec40a72400fb6db
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..b6638a3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/98/f54c3d6198fe96105cb7504ec40a72400fb6db
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C68429E26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:36:00 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 8m13v3bKuB+s for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:36:00 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC42429E25\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:36:00 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD5366E0024;\r
+       Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:35:59 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from finestructure.net (gwave-212.ligo.caltech.edu\r
+ [131.215.114.212])    (Authenticated sender: jrollins)        by earth-doxen-submit\r
+ (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD7D66E00D3; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:35:55 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id C904A38C; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:35:55 -0500 (EST)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>,\r
+       David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: optionally print subtest number\r
+In-Reply-To: <87hb14ukbc.fsf@gmail.com>\r
+References: <1323806207-31888-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net>\r
+       <87zkew2jtu.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <87d3bsjc1z.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87hb14ukbc.fsf@gmail.com>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+93~ga124635 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:35:53 -0800\r
+Message-ID: <87pqfs2gfa.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 23:36:00 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 03:24:23 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmai=\r
+l.com> wrote:\r
+> BTW I have some plans to introduce optional explicit test ids that can\r
+> be used for inter-test dependencies.  E.g.:\r
+>=20\r
+>   test_begin_subtest test-id-1 "A subtest"\r
+>   ....\r
+>   ;; in another test requre that test-id-1 passed\r
+>   test_require_subtest test-id-1\r
+\r
+Would the required test need to be listed twice, both on the\r
+begin_subtest line *and* in the require_subtest line?\r
+\r
+And again, why would the test id have to be any different that the\r
+existing test names?  The tests already have names, so I don't\r
+understand why we would want to introduce some other kind of\r
+identification.  Seems like it's just going to add extra confusion.\r
+\r
+And speaking of which, I sometimes worry that the test infrastructure\r
+itself is getting too complicated.  Pretty soon we're going to need\r
+tests for the tests.  I don't necessarily see the need to all of these\r
+extra features in the test suite, so I worry that it's just making\r
+everything harder to debug.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJO5+FZAAoJEO00zqvie6q8lhoP/jhjExA5NfqGXGNEuud6+EiH\r
+X4UAMav/6kwZYJHV8meAm9QQOsUDUW9gVQY0zrcslu2A+NqWt57eKafCHkQW1yDU\r
+1C63XDlR9pelN2HdFhyzPlfXBTn++MfANZQ+QqXb+y+v1htem3GKszbXIXxPOjn2\r
+A1kjYYSvJAhxYpQ/UrRSGUc4MaCbLRylggRDoqonrGtZCi7hKQh6QErPt1J/iPp3\r
+7dEV71sjQsTfl27OUEGnWIdFKUDRRodqyiV6lbeI2xLNcsKAmXyiI4v31PGs2aH2\r
+3XwpegitBN34Q+GBg/EfAIRyowrdluBCBx9cyB1VMDQF/VLnmjWWngVUwN5x8H55\r
+RjUfu/ze6g8FOiSEzzODF9g8YwQefy00lGs+JUaNgVcCFI1mivdrQcPsE1jV2Pb9\r
+cKcfa+9Mc07+aYgAM1FyiIbnWVgl12kLknW5UYviVpQTb4CsninYeMog2YbZg7Ar\r
+EZnoGpN7fzWAsvNd/Usy6dZGPZ2FBgFOajUC54J1Z1VDjFNpjfgG2teFhiNU3aiG\r
+tW0TUOxQh1fzDrqsjHiaMAuBfNGYOcJr0+UsXG7mKbe/O6WuTyNEyKi55ph11Xj+\r
+0ml6DBBbaqSrqVG5JTfxG1y+9DTd/58LSCscO46sE1vL3B6fRaBH3/x3mV117bo+\r
+3VKbP0Wd4AzVf7lvcFju\r
+=PfdM\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r