Re: [PATCH v1] emacs: Report a lack of matches when calling `notmuch-show'.
authorDavid Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
Mon, 8 Feb 2016 11:28:28 +0000 (11:28 +0000)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Sat, 20 Aug 2016 23:21:01 +0000 (16:21 -0700)
76/73a9be87e4153e975e2a9d2aa9fef6caf173d4 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/76/73a9be87e4153e975e2a9d2aa9fef6caf173d4 b/76/73a9be87e4153e975e2a9d2aa9fef6caf173d4
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..f93de1f
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E9066DE0B22\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  8 Feb 2016 03:28:36 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.056\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.056 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.123, \r
+ DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7,\r
+ RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652,\r
+ UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id myMWG3CpFxcB for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Mon,  8 Feb 2016 03:28:32 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com (mail-wm0-f68.google.com\r
+ [74.125.82.68]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82F9A6DE0C42 for\r
+ <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  8 Feb 2016 03:28:32 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by mail-wm0-f68.google.com with SMTP id p63so15047813wmp.1\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 03:28:32 -0800 (PST)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+ d=dme-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;\r
+ h=to:subject:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:mime-version\r
+ :content-type; bh=4XV6+DreR4AHegDxApJMNNjYIH74V/tOAbu2A7btz1I=;\r
+ b=yLDRkhqFMWm6Z+9i+KWMstfkVPKd4ZxZlH4+TNcDUsC4ew/+Auucr5itZ0sMlnsCTp\r
+ LPTclyjCf/GgSt/eL5Cq60O2Tecifv1/nNTyyMfa1k6ooApWq03Ed+mWNxL/bNQrlW4/\r
+ hZLNOqulmFhg+1hbqVExRMhM49iBdk3YvCxkt88uZKL+FV4S1SCxmKQfJqRKDVD7ejRv\r
+ b3wtITqRTRgLWaFS2HzMKApKEEfxlSDIIDtUwhhm8qxkkZSakfI7/Viglt1iOIpSzt1Z\r
+ mtQhFX22oJU01KIPvY/XKLxOgprQHxPB+4rWqxTbd1vP2Wa/ZusIG7xOth2x1hRn9pmL\r
+ eXWA==\r
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+ d=1e100.net; s=20130820;\r
+ h=x-gm-message-state:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:from:date\r
+ :message-id:mime-version:content-type;\r
+ bh=4XV6+DreR4AHegDxApJMNNjYIH74V/tOAbu2A7btz1I=;\r
+ b=cuqunvurUNZHb06jHvZLio2Y/O4QVwnedy2htCOM7qf6CGVhlAXnP2hwiF5TGtBHlb\r
+ hC5Bz80voiFgtAj0KRgdamaWapxavSG60Gip0iPRsPcvaDT7QGDJJXACGTBOCWepN27A\r
+ ptujzNikLxc46y/SlGngsQWWjNtEuyiM0n/QEhOduu8yGCf8NsLaKs1v1+66FlDhHNXI\r
+ MIh5mXY/bQya1KQp6hWGRFMsutu7PtzHAbYE8kX8OKO9eCn7o/EM7dKe+lB6Cz5ao8ID\r
+ VYpmcCB3aDwNi5H0hUdb4oK0nu7WHohnlLKGinozHCEtqpA0wUykii1fbe2XaRrzgzBg\r
+ nDFw==\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ AG10YORHBnGY7mZkFjFqFtyFW5qbJ/qhNShMdV0VArsxT//qmS2cCKMMJYJZMJYkiqTDwg==\r
+X-Received: by 10.28.227.213 with SMTP id a204mr15451970wmh.2.1454930910962;\r
+ Mon, 08 Feb 2016 03:28:30 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from disaster-area.hh.sledj.net\r
+ ([2a01:348:1a2:1:ea39:35ff:fe2c:a227])\r
+ by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i10sm1104680wmf.14.2016.02.08.03.28.28\r
+ (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);\r
+ Mon, 08 Feb 2016 03:28:29 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from localhost (disaster-area.hh.sledj.net [local])\r
+ by disaster-area.hh.sledj.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 2ad053fc;\r
+ Mon, 8 Feb 2016 11:28:28 +0000 (UTC)\r
+To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] emacs: Report a lack of matches when calling\r
+ `notmuch-show'.\r
+In-Reply-To: <871t8onmnb.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+References: <1454782892-1690-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>\r
+ <1454782892-1690-2-git-send-email-dme@dme.org> <871t8onmnb.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>\r
+Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 11:28:28 +0000\r
+Message-ID: <m21t8n5tlv.fsf@heart-of-gold.hh.sledj.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 11:28:36 -0000\r
+\r
+On Sun, Feb 07 2016, Mark Walters wrote:\r
+> However, I wonder if we actually want an error at all in this case,\r
+> rather than just a "message". I think some people run with\r
+> debug-on-error enabled and it might be annoying in that case (though\r
+> clearly less annoying than the current situation).\r
+\r
+How about (ding) (message "...") ?\r