Re: Reply code with TEXT/PLAIN

diff --git a/a4/d9992c03afdfd0056f248f2d8e75b543d0fa57 b/a4/d9992c03afdfd0056f248f2d8e75b543d0fa57
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..73af280
--- /dev/null
+++ b/a4/d9992c03afdfd0056f248f2d8e75b543d0fa57
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4B16431FBD\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:21:29 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id xUJe-jsBWkvy for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:21:29 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F9A431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:21:29 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD8552E50AC5;\r
+       Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:21:28 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from finestructure.net (pool-108-27-62-184.nycmny.fios.verizon.net\r
+       [108.27.62.184]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
+       by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id E457A2E508D7;\r
+       Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:21:24 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id C6968573; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:21:23 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: Adam Wolfe Gordon <awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>,\r
+       Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: Reply code with TEXT/PLAIN\r
+In-Reply-To:\r
+ <CAMoJFUuGS_y4Sqtug5Ohdic3M43_fexWOt7cAw-ebuZ_SVUnjQ@mail.gmail.com>\r
+References: <87d3814qkv.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+       <CAMoJFUuGS_y4Sqtug5Ohdic3M43_fexWOt7cAw-ebuZ_SVUnjQ@mail.gmail.com>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+335~gf868783 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:21:21 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <8762drl766.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:21:29 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+\r
+On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 18:19:50 -0600, Adam Wolfe Gordon <awg+notmuch@xvx.ca> wrote:\r
+> A bit of Googling indicates that MIME types should be case insensitive\r
+> (i.e. TEXT/PLAIN should match text/plain). Given this, I think it\r
+> makes sense to change the emacs function regardless of whether it\r
+> makes sense for the CLI to output them in lower-case.\r
+\r
+Does it make sense for the cli to canonicalize the content types to\r
+always be lower case?  Or should it continue to just pass the content\r
+type exactly as it appears in the original message?  Given that\r
+consumers should parse it case insensitively, it maybe doesn't matter,\r
+but it might also be nice for us to be consistent.  Maybe it's just ok\r
+as it is.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPcIlxAAoJEO00zqvie6q8p7IQAK6Jku8cTtQjSAC8kCl59BEk\r
+qoLfQhAi6n2PNmYTVQvoAjSCLoToAHFfeXVkEseVr+vPc0cZb5jGA+mbGdWQzGjw\r
+8fYXvk9fEDT/Q0BB7/8UF0fIiV2Ezn0SHvajVobBoeW6XGvOmlL98ik7xJIfKtGd\r
++A+noMFk+r4R+sszx4AtFnKKIcc5Sgpl8DcJ8IplS4mUkmiEA+HeezHlkOz7ro1J\r
+N8oXDQqyLLeuc3W5Q771kUTdUhFQOmN5W46OjUcd78BIB/b5RNchgB191sTFJFxq\r
++ikuSxggiFsbmEA/eUFLCftyUtZnkNYeI/Bol1OulmxWYoVwyApmdwRmOnaGd/mA\r
+P5BYqOC6sWg6pwCgvUqH3KAOrtPoTFMxqb/mcBeqxCHIr6SUOxJJMtB4tAsizZZD\r
+XDgDhxvUjM/1MPwroey32/3eoqUM4nPewdmfUF32VyNqp0gh0L5co4/ajtR8voyZ\r
+N+uD5qERYcH/uq4GyP/bv/lNoy+HRwZlKJCeJuy+Fzi/c4JI9npOON+3EAgwcyD2\r
+CEX5jtK859aMTsrFajm0Uy3ZyFBmiFCpq5r2wAfKWTfs3BcG13gu4YRUay5c1xrT\r
+ruF35aTy3McL1HzsaWeAfWJV1zjMZ7GL22I9Z4RtATzcWJOrIIni+D7m9AYLx2BM\r
+W1VXHS6mFZ9eQmX30iU8\r
+=/n9n\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r