emacs: notmuch-tree, reading messages and tags

diff --git a/01/1eadc7dea5b131e9ffa67db50f5700822c89d6 b/01/1eadc7dea5b131e9ffa67db50f5700822c89d6
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..d5e2c69
--- /dev/null
+++ b/01/1eadc7dea5b131e9ffa67db50f5700822c89d6
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+Return-Path: <matt@bubblegen.co.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA9AF431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 05:22:47 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 1.738\r
+X-Spam-Level: *\r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.738 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=2.438, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id sAB4xrZvfcdJ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed, 11 Mar 2015 05:22:44 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from avasout04.plus.net (avasout04.plus.net [212.159.14.19])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42DAB431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 05:22:44 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost ([84.93.237.98]) by avasout04 with smtp\r
+       id 2CNg1q004283uBY01CNhrE; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 12:22:42 +0000\r
+X-CM-Score: 0.00\r
+X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=CYWG5dbl c=1 sm=1 tr=0\r
+       a=BJaFPv9AyABFDM2hXLRoEA==:117 a=BJaFPv9AyABFDM2hXLRoEA==:17\r
+       a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8\r
+       a=fne2aKG5GRsA:10 a=wPDyFdB5xvgA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=80hmnl3cAAAA:8\r
+       a=emO1SXQWCLwA:10 a=YB-reyM-LP5F8jLbG5wA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10\r
+Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=webmail.plus.net)\r
+       by localhost with esmtp (Exim 4.76)\r
+       (envelope-from <matt@bubblegen.co.uk>) id 1YVfeq-0006Uo-4U\r
+       for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 12:22:40 +0000\r
+Received: from 216.31.211.11 (proxying for unknown)\r
+       (SquirrelMail authenticated user bubblegen+matt)\r
+       by webmail.plus.net with HTTP; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 12:22:40 -0000\r
+Message-ID: <97881ceaba7c5057e21676c4102c5c7d.squirrel@webmail.plus.net>\r
+Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 12:22:40 -0000\r
+Subject: emacs: notmuch-tree, reading messages and tags\r
+From: "Matthew Lear" <matt@bubblegen.co.uk>\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+User-Agent: SquirrelMail\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\r
+X-Priority: 3 (Normal)\r
+Importance: Normal\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+Reply-To: matt@bubblegen.co.uk\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 12:22:47 -0000\r
+\r
+Hi,\r
+If I switch to viewing a thread with notmuch-tree, I can navigate through,\r
+and read messages using up/down + RET just fine. Each message is shown in\r
+a seperate window. However, if point never enters that message window, the\r
+unread tag is removed (strikethrough) from the message in the notmuch-tree\r
+view but not from the message in the message window itself. If I refresh\r
+the notmuch tree view, all messages still have their unread tag applied.\r
+\r
+The only time that the unread tag is removed is if point enters the\r
+message window. For messages that are only a few lines long (eg a reply to\r
+the previous message in the thread is only a few lines) and which can be\r
+read without putting point in the message window to scroll, having to\r
+specifically select the message window in order for the unread tag to be\r
+removed from the message seems totally unnecessary and is inconvenient.\r
+\r
+Is this by design or am I using it wrongly? Is this behaviour configurable?\r
+\r
+Cheers,\r
+--  Matt\r
+\r