Re: MIME restructuring [was: Re: release-candidate/0.6]

diff --git a/3d/1e4880c073d154f7dd583c9bebf9cf81f85cc2 b/3d/1e4880c073d154f7dd583c9bebf9cf81f85cc2
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..8bc9ac1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/3d/1e4880c073d154f7dd583c9bebf9cf81f85cc2
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2FB1429E26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 May 2011 15:37:56 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01]\r
+       autolearn=unavailable\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id cuv2GAV0Ww0Q for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon, 16 May 2011 15:37:56 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8625431FD0\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 May 2011 15:37:56 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC8866E0381;\r
+       Mon, 16 May 2011 15:37:53 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from servo.finestructure.net (gwave-176.ligo.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.114.176]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
+       by earth-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A4AC66E01F4;\r
+       Mon, 16 May 2011 15:37:49 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by servo.finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 49835625; Mon, 16 May 2011 15:37:50 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>,\r
+ Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>\r
+Subject: Re: MIME restructuring [was: Re: release-candidate/0.6]\r
+In-Reply-To: <87ei3ybawo.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+References: <8762pn7gth.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
+       <874o4zczr8.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+       <87wrhvyqfn.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
+       <87r57ybcna.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+       <4DD18DFE.7090206@fifthhorseman.net>\r
+       <87ei3ybawo.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 15:37:49 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <87wrhq8e6a.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+Cc: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 22:37:57 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Mon, 16 May 2011 14:20:07 -0700, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:\r
+> I'll have to learn better how to control the emacs mail composer in\r
+> order to understand how to get signatures to cover attachments if I want\r
+> to do that kind of thing.\r
+\r
+See mml-secure-message-sign-pgpmime to sign an entire message, as\r
+opposed to just a single part.\r
+\r
+> This seems to be justifying my fears about the code duplication---the\r
+> two code paths are already divergent, (which means that things like\r
+> notmuch part-number identifiers cannot be used between the different\r
+> formats). I'd like to fix that by preventing the code duplication.\r
+>=20\r
+> Also, both paths seem to be suffering from some excess part-number\r
+> incrementing somewhere.\r
+\r
+I think the two paths reconverge later in the series.  Can you look\r
+ahead a bit to see if that concern is addressed?\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJN0ac+AAoJEO00zqvie6q8LS0QAJtF3KnxKMC1NU+7d5qoypex\r
+M/eTd3G4VkyvHO9vEeT1WdJFwqZ/VZsarvUDUoZV7Vqj3+YVyZiQCeDJNGUoxhj6\r
+M0otxHOzmR/1S2e/WOOFG2ZqXzi93tzLNtlRze6F3rvIiaEX6zblCkGo74a20DZ/\r
+lYecVJazzln7DAZBXHtZHRonNu1pwoQ83qdHVoJLAR00EFsENIwlTETfF7YZyuo8\r
+BuQQ7t0fwsPdZSbxB27hjtm+sgCsg7vfYwkm7aPnVWAZlejf+rHBUQK7R4eNK3t9\r
+/nKDyi/LfuTVJutMCUInuYcqnAosNx6XPLBRnz8DM6zaFE8AbXVite7lmOf42mFQ\r
+iSnORZ+WtZHEJdxA99Cl1xuHaBbZiMAPEQxl6ikxuLPB17OLuihbccLFfjqFe3tX\r
+zTpND+BnjGSTSW9wbMw25Q1hFLTtcVZjMG8dWHhzN/nn28vq3BSCzDS/tBsQeVyn\r
+IIj3XFuJCntFOXliUwL6WTcUgZhEV0Tl+bYYe4G9IQksHim/O110EIaChUsM9XXK\r
+rh96GWZxOgmfAVkiFkDM8vLE2DPLQjZMkeehRW2wOSP9nTxNILLfEAvcQ33Wzhis\r
+Qvs7dTexao1kWwNvU7g9/PsYeDovzhrfBzM5kDikplnIHi+nwegXrRJAfRBkzVCV\r
+GcsEi9RH5d3zHU3D3HI5\r
+=CBS/\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r