Re: [PATCH 0/7] doc: Python 3 compat, rst2man.py support, etc.

diff --git a/c9/cf6d173ee588e0b8742f943c0d201e7340535e b/c9/cf6d173ee588e0b8742f943c0d201e7340535e
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..82b2922
--- /dev/null
+++ b/c9/cf6d173ee588e0b8742f943c0d201e7340535e
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23DCE431FBD\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 15:57:17 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id CuNzpLvk7y4i for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sun, 20 Apr 2014 15:57:09 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com (gitolite.debian.net\r
+       [87.98.215.224]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1131431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 15:57:08 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from remotemail by mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com with local (Exim\r
+       4.72) (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+       id 1Wc0fX-0007Hj-Gh; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 22:57:03 +0000\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 7508 invoked by uid 1000); Sun, 20 Apr 2014\r
+       22:56:54 -0000\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>, "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us>,\r
+       notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] doc: Python 3 compat, rst2man.py support, etc.\r
+In-Reply-To: <m2ppkjpz9s.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+References: <cover.1396718720.git.wking@tremily.us>\r
+       <m2ppkjpz9s.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+202~gb65f328 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 07:56:54 +0900\r
+Message-ID: <87wqejtxs9.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 22:57:17 -0000\r
+\r
+Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> writes:\r
+\r
+> In this series IMO the patches 1-4:\r
+>\r
+> id:8d518408f2da8bc96ae3123f05791142da26b9bc.1396718720.git.wking@tremily.us\r
+> id:543aee63407956e60f85dc11a2d25855e98c10c3.1396718720.git.wking@tremily.us\r
+> id:5e4509ab08699afe2681110fb35075e1d0bbdc7e.1396718720.git.wking@tremily.us\r
+> id:c5ec510ac25c867ad600c475a0070a003440a4b8.1396718720.git.wking@tremily.us\r
+>\r
+> could go in as those are. 5:\r
+>\r
+> id:adce76bb9a0ca728d856da4ecaf6b282e22e7440.1396718720.git.wking@tremily.us\r
+>\r
+> if, for consistency reason (we don't use absolute paths with other commands\r
+> either), rst2man/rst2man.py is used as is (and commit message adjusted\r
+> accordingly).\r
+\r
+I've queued 1-4 for merging. Any patches that might break the build\r
+(e.g. 5 and 6 in this series) have to go in pretty quick if they are to\r
+be in 0.18; patch 7 we can sort out during the freeze.\r
+\r
+I'm not sure I completely understand the state of the discussion around\r
+patch 5. Personally I don't like either undefined or empty RST2MAN as a\r
+boolean a priori. I'd rather keep HAVE_RST2MAN for consistency.\r
+\r
+d\r