Re: [PATCH] Avoid empty thread names if possible.
authorJesse Rosenthal <jrosenthal@jhu.edu>
Wed, 29 Oct 2014 13:27:59 +0000 (09:27 +2000)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 18:05:48 +0000 (10:05 -0800)
b9/aa4fd0cf1c0c7a28ac9c2ab5ab6465096094a0 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/b9/aa4fd0cf1c0c7a28ac9c2ab5ab6465096094a0 b/b9/aa4fd0cf1c0c7a28ac9c2ab5ab6465096094a0
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..9846d28
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+Return-Path: <prvs=372b3579b=jrosenthal@jhu.edu>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8780431FC2\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 06:28:05 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id b9v8POIj-Z6T for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed, 29 Oct 2014 06:28:00 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from smtpauth.johnshopkins.edu (smtpauth.johnshopkins.edu\r
+       [128.220.229.167]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BB61431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 06:28:00 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,810,1406606400"; d="scan'208";a="485201920"\r
+Received: from guppy.hwcampus.jhu.edu (HELO localhost) ([10.161.32.234])\r
+       by IPMTW3.johnshopkins.edu with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA;\r
+       29 Oct 2014 09:28:01 -0400\r
+From: Jesse Rosenthal <jrosenthal@jhu.edu>\r
+To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] Avoid empty thread names if possible.\r
+In-Reply-To: <87a94f2fe3.fsf@jhu.edu>\r
+References: <87oatnakqy.fsf@jhu.edu> <87tx2nuvec.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+       <87a94f2fe3.fsf@jhu.edu>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.2+155~gafa8535 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1\r
+       (i686-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 09:27:59 -0400\r
+Message-ID: <87tx2n9fa8.fsf@jhu.edu>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 13:28:07 -0000\r
+\r
+Hmm, that's strange -- my inital detailed response to Mark's message\r
+didn't go through to the list. I wonder if it's being filtered or\r
+something. \r