Re: multiple machine tagging

diff --git a/43/5c2b732978f3b03864c0b88dd1fa5c622d9be5 b/43/5c2b732978f3b03864c0b88dd1fa5c622d9be5
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..59d5626
--- /dev/null
+++ b/43/5c2b732978f3b03864c0b88dd1fa5c622d9be5
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9902431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:26:34 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id yVoFaFnAe5oI for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:26:30 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com\r
+       [209.85.212.180]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E71BD431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:26:29 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id ex7so4348815wid.13\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:26:28 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+       d=1e100.net; s=20130820;\r
+       h=x-gm-message-state:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent\r
+       :from:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;\r
+       bh=1OJsguNGqls2JFvwpeF0cY+5TFIZyuKfwCGFsgQI7sQ=;\r
+       b=N49sxrx19nBm/BFHON9cM/DpJ5OCNcOFHv+CjFwQJkkO6BaODQWP+bGVgb3PgKIvcv\r
+       KYzR8HcP6VtYG2KnDQMYyD1sF0BAU4d7X3+XVTgK8i2e4FeIk+8rSsxklXQ4fhPw+Lfh\r
+       gFtQNB6c4OUZQjaVanmkjOzNKC14pDdRc3R6Zm5eUbIN7Ir/PLpWOv4GnW1S+WWn8lCT\r
+       c+TdenjX4tbgPDro+n4mJgEqSPCpLh8TpYnEZ/7Xi4bMlS+TA9zcphXNi/4AbzjbCHXJ\r
+       r+cLfZWlcZQZV5UWBucP3W17RrLf9fGjT3KWU9wtT80EUM2XzgmVwsasjFejWjC/VIuR\r
+       BmWA==\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ ALoCoQmvdlvay6fbuI+GrwgbAZaFUlSVBRGR9cCRpkZZAhz4SJpkCq+J9l2kynTtH4C9X7MJghN0\r
+X-Received: by 10.180.211.76 with SMTP id na12mr23649849wic.57.1410791188635; \r
+       Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:26:28 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost ([2a01:348:1a2:1:f00a:9c2f:b998:3319])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id p1sm14969943wjy.22.2014.09.15.07.26.27\r
+       for <multiple recipients>\r
+       (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);\r
+       Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:26:27 -0700 (PDT)\r
+To: "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us>\r
+Subject: Re: multiple machine tagging\r
+In-Reply-To: <20140915141410.GA31881@odin.tremily.us>\r
+References: <87vdaj2d4p.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net>\r
+       <m2bnqhkn8j.fsf@fenchurch.hh.sledj.net>\r
+       <20140915141410.GA31881@odin.tremily.us>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-apple-darwin)\r
+From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>\r
+Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:26:26 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <m28ullklil.fsf@fenchurch.hh.sledj.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 14:26:35 -0000\r
+\r
+On Mon, Sep 15 2014, W. Trevor King wrote:\r
+> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 02:49:16PM +0100, David Edmondson wrote:\r
+>> On Thu, May 20 2010, David Edmondson wrote:\r
+>> (Wow, was it really more than four years ago?)\r
+>> \r
+>> > What's the current state of the art in merging tags from multiple\r
+>> > machines?\r
+>> >\r
+>> > In my own case the contents of the mail store can be considered\r
+>> > identical on the different machines. Automated tagging is mostly fine\r
+>> > - it can just happen on each of the machines. Any hand-added tags are\r
+>> > a problem, though.\r
+>> \r
+>> Is there any significant change to this picture?\r
+>\r
+> Does nmbug not do this for you?  This is exactly what it was designed\r
+> to do (sync tags).\r
+\r
+Perhaps. Is anyone using it for personal tag sync?\r