Re: [PATCH] notmuch restore --accumulate
authorLouis Rilling <l.rilling@av7.net>
Fri, 9 Sep 2011 09:06:34 +0000 (11:06 +0200)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:39:24 +0000 (09:39 -0800)
c4/772e6646d688200a9fa5ce93f4bd4dbebc93c6 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/c4/772e6646d688200a9fa5ce93f4bd4dbebc93c6 b/c4/772e6646d688200a9fa5ce93f4bd4dbebc93c6
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..d6a3904
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+Return-Path: <lrilling@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83ABD431FD0\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  9 Sep 2011 02:06:45 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.699\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+       RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id t4Y2ft1vBLlc for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Fri,  9 Sep 2011 02:06:45 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com\r
+       [209.85.161.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B883D431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  9 Sep 2011 02:06:44 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by fxd23 with SMTP id 23so2380673fxd.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 02:06:43 -0700 (PDT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
+       h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version\r
+       :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;\r
+       bh=2jPSwPdJ+R5HTQw69Wa6DlxgJg/nnoTm/Xwkc8NaDo8=;\r
+       b=F68HrEOSKELXy/RdO5WJ27VliOUBN31B1KqjMabDs4AV2aTIH/deWD/Erumrl6m3P2\r
+       2HpJecyJ4qNB/3ZF5cXPSx1XEesxgGmffE/9QPVDZeHIborqwtvXCbi7uV5EAJcV/d6t\r
+       ShEeK02b/J9eOQCFnF9JyrPkOeAz5Hf/x91XQ=\r
+Received: by 10.223.42.24 with SMTP id q24mr2381310fae.148.1315559203231;\r
+       Fri, 09 Sep 2011 02:06:43 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localdomain ([78.222.14.116])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q23sm2599155fae.1.2011.09.09.02.06.41\r
+       (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 09 Sep 2011 02:06:42 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Sender: Louis Rilling <lrilling@gmail.com>\r
+Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 11:06:34 +0200\r
+From: Louis Rilling <l.rilling@av7.net>\r
+To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] notmuch restore --accumulate\r
+Message-ID: <20110909090633.GA3178@localdomain>\r
+References: <1315249637-20179-1-git-send-email-thomas@schwinge.name>\r
+       <87liu2kcq6.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+Content-Disposition: inline\r
+In-Reply-To: <87liu2kcq6.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
+User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org, Thomas Schwinge <thomas@schwinge.name>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:06:45 -0000\r
+\r
+On 05/09/11 12:31 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:\r
+> Also, we generally prefer to have modifications to the test suite in\r
+> separate patches that precede the patches that add the features/fix the\r
+> bugs.\r
+> \r
+\r
+For new features, this does not look like 'git bisect'-safe. I would say that\r
+the testsuite patch should follow the new feature patch, don't you?\r
+\r
+Thanks,\r
+\r
+Louis\r
+\r
+> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@schwinge.name>\r
+> \r
+> Finally, you don't need to sign off on your own patches.\r
+> \r
+> Thanks.\r
+> \r
+> jamie.\r
+\r
+\r
+\r
+> _______________________________________________\r
+> notmuch mailing list\r
+> notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch\r
+\r