Re: [notmuch] loss of duplicate messages

diff --git a/f2/474b1f9f44d430225a6be45911c3aaeeddfd18 b/f2/474b1f9f44d430225a6be45911c3aaeeddfd18
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..dffca91
--- /dev/null
+++ b/f2/474b1f9f44d430225a6be45911c3aaeeddfd18
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+Return-Path: <micah@riseup.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C96CC431FBD\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  5 Feb 2010 11:38:58 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.681\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.681 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.317,\r
+       BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]  autolearn=ham\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id RDQ3bfZXVKQf for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Fri,  5 Feb 2010 11:38:58 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [204.13.164.18])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E06431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  5 Feb 2010 11:38:58 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       (Authenticated sender: micah@mx1.riseup.net)\r
+       with ESMTPSA id 6266818C227\r
+Received: by lillypad (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id C9B862CC173; Fri,  5 Feb 2010 14:39:22 -0500 (EST)\r
+From: micah anderson <micah@riseup.net>\r
+To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>, Marten Veldthuis\r
+       <marten@veldthuis.com>, Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+In-Reply-To: <871vgzwp26.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+References: <878wb7wsnt.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <87zl3nr3vc.fsf@marten.rgoc.rug.nl>\r
+       <871vgzwp26.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:39:22 -0500\r
+Message-ID: <87vdebcw0l.fsf@lillypad.riseup.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at mx1\r
+X-Virus-Status: Clean\r
+Subject: Re: [notmuch] loss of duplicate messages\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:38:59 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:49:21 -0500, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestr=\r
+ucture.net> wrote:=20\r
+> A policy of only returning one is going to be problematic for folks who\r
+> want or expect to see the other.  And in fact think I want to see both.\r
+> I have both, and I've asked notmuch to index both, so why shouldn't it\r
+> return both in a search?\r
+\r
+Welcome to how gmail does it. When they first hit the scene, as an\r
+operator of a large mailing list service, I was *constantly* being\r
+bugged with support issues from people who were expecting this very\r
+behavior, "I sent a message to the list, but I never got it, did it get\r
+posted to the list?!". Soon I found out that gmail did exactly what\r
+you are reporting notmuch as doing.\r
+\r
+The frightening thing is that over the last few years of gmail's\r
+existence, those complaints and support issues have totally gone\r
+away. Does that mean that gmail has trained people to no longer expect\r
+this behavior?\r
+\r
+micah\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJLbHPqAAoJEIy/mjIoYaeQhVcP/0Y0a8r7zu5hVNMIM69GiF3G\r
+hqZ/ErwC4yE++U5MevyggYJnxxVTaeMo7s9kmR27azaqO0XdJHAfUvXrkhk8PZ/M\r
+XjUF57plOUoqiULsflsbzawjyb9XUWtzVVq7j9Q0hxOi3oGmXLEj/4BMUK/2uds8\r
+sSG2wqYF2wkWk072NuQey1+EJ6jY49QFtk9mZ4Vf69mCrstcQ/x6hwAjjQOBGDZC\r
+EHWMzTGJpkVxh4m+CeeQPKqsnhSBFt5mTX70WmqnqNQZP4A4mrtflJTBbRXnmc/W\r
+phl2H8xvKjptKaNfxX4vLfz36OYeTAtnrpPYPqivqbxQWhKnzo/D9Poy+awTGu4A\r
+tWw7l1hVAa+HI6r1oHA+sepiiMB9io3s/WYuAWwu0iB7heyebvLlYUkH4KROAq3l\r
+vMlMTMe9TKwICSHjYjdcoBqdGUWcOUte/lB4gOUL2Zsz6QwefKHJ8k6BmdFPNxqk\r
+SU+ArG/QMl5i2kAOu5XFSi/zaHKfrsymbgU3lA0gVeJWIn1RVLZ7qVkB6gHs1HC+\r
+5YNhCRUWXoRjVND5xlfRmnv9TDc20xS+Lpe1Li8hANALi39YBFsLy2BUdtyOmPWb\r
+0BZZum+5K4I5m7nFo2mHzyNqVL5nmQmpUxyrsLRk+O23/fWmcN4VPUObfLbOUPhq\r
+7edSYy6WEjCHccaVXwZV\r
+=gTMN\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r