Re: [notmuch] Git ancestry and sync problems (was: Mail in git)
authorJameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:20:38 +0000 (07:20 +1900)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:36:14 +0000 (09:36 -0800)
c8/e09a4740ca1a745443550389375dc8167c15e5 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/c8/e09a4740ca1a745443550389375dc8167c15e5 b/c8/e09a4740ca1a745443550389375dc8167c15e5
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..303f7f4
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19CF9431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 04:21:02 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -3.719\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.719 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.280,\r
+       BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] autolearn=ham\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id l94fxbB55i9P for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Thu, 18 Feb 2010 04:21:01 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from brinza.cc.columbia.edu (brinza.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.8])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65516431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 04:21:01 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from servo.finestructure.net (cpe-72-227-128-66.nyc.res.rr.com\r
+       [72.227.128.66])\r
+       (user=jgr2110 author=jrollins@finestructure.net mech=PLAIN bits=0)\r
+       by brinza.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o1ICKkta018893\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);\r
+       Thu, 18 Feb 2010 07:20:46 -0500 (EST)\r
+Received: from jrollins by servo.finestructure.net with local (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <jrollins@finestructure.net>)\r
+       id 1Ni5N8-0005jm-1J; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 07:20:46 -0500\r
+From: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: racin@free.fr, martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net>\r
+In-Reply-To:\r
+ <899270357.3379251266482068203.JavaMail.root@zimbra1-e1.priv.proxad.net>\r
+References:\r
+ <899270357.3379251266482068203.JavaMail.root@zimbra1-e1.priv.proxad.net>\r
+Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 07:20:38 -0500\r
+Message-ID: <87sk8yka5l.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-No-Spam-Score: Local\r
+X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.8\r
+Cc: Ben Gamari <bgamari@gmail.com>, notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: [notmuch] Git ancestry and sync problems (was:  Mail in git)\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:21:02 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:34:28 +0100 (CET), racin@free.fr wrote:\r
+> I don't understand the problem. Why not just letting all "inbox" mails in=\r
+ a regular Maildir,=20\r
+> and use git only when they have been explicit archived? This way, mails a=\r
+re added to git only if we want\r
+> to save them, and we rarely (never?) need to remove mail from the git sto=\r
+re. Deleting mail\r
+> is also much easier to do from the maildir. This mail flow would make muc=\r
+h more sense to me.\r
+\r
+I agree that this sounds much simpler and far easier to implement.  Once\r
+you're passed any deletion phase, using git sounds much more sensible.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLfTCXAAoJEO00zqvie6q8tN0P/2ES6Kdk9/FkfMNltE80rDAS\r
+YlLHWN1C6ByM3NNqr0i5CSdaBxzdLOuOVOfMHhWRJYpGNe1sQ/ChqE1yOZckvtim\r
+r9bNN4AUF/FN2K5VsPqa3l6EdRdnM9BXFphbr2tKJCyU6AuUV/gGO0WhcHnyd/Ky\r
+w6vzj4n+N1vohFcBy2vKS6Dq10niVGwujjbHvFZ3XoXl07bH+YRfMIS4nQS66xiT\r
+XIsQIdmFka2UxJQeTFU4p3mfKxZbDJLPGFY97k3RlCDVGpJijXNMEANBzQ95QbN5\r
+hhIPB94GCuwXHEd00toUAYDzPvPMCL2ugRPzJ7p1S81iJCZHrq3zZ2spuHL+Nljh\r
+P98UiATawcKPYLRCtjVbJs5btd1PWgKX2KJRibmiSTBwGvv2rJgM4bfhrXRcEit1\r
+yzDaALFbxBxXHB4lxgNqjsStYU5xWDz2V4lrdDZtVxfe9ViV72yWbvQkEfbOP/A7\r
+IS42+2lv5nS21WTgUZgplR3ON4tEvnUlwrE2IoQMQSKWzFeVhboIL6iQjSu97tm/\r
+lKOw9y5uYbdu2pg7KHN8+cFxp9k96rcFDPGce/H+GUfTuMqDGrGHQ9uTVBf0GfuK\r
+wgCOVU5Y16m1jp+8Sr433F5HpLyDxPhwfmae6xYNijqDGaYICeYHTxiMlCpZVfP/\r
+chHkuSCq9kZAve2vUA2m\r
+=BtsF\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r