Re: [PATCH] notmuch.vim can tag messages deleted

diff --git a/77/7fd38b3df0d7bba42ed329355ce37e659b3a61 b/77/7fd38b3df0d7bba42ed329355ce37e659b3a61
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..b58a279
--- /dev/null
+++ b/77/7fd38b3df0d7bba42ed329355ce37e659b3a61
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+Return-Path: <jeff@jrichards.ca>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4F3B431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  4 Apr 2011 22:57:21 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id lKqnFzi-SSca for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon,  4 Apr 2011 22:57:21 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from idcmail-mo2no.shaw.ca (idcmail-mo2no.shaw.ca [64.59.134.9])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46D44431FB5\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  4 Apr 2011 22:57:21 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from pd6ml2no-ssvc.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.153.163])\r
+       by pd7mo1no-svcs.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 04 Apr 2011 23:57:20 -0600\r
+X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true\r
+X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=Mj7okGGiyvljez8nourwAOSCyIXzraNcHEi86Qy5a+Y=\r
+       c=1 sm=1\r
+       a=xbPtcpxtUlcA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=GmI124iNGYoA:10\r
+       a=fZIboY/cEU6l/H7GC6ozQQ==:17 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=Sl2rT_Nh-kx5GP60s0cA:9\r
+       a=gpEkqqQGF7-7dIK1tnsA:7 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10\r
+       a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117\r
+Received: from unknown (HELO fanny.gardenlogbook.com) ([96.50.110.35])\r
+       by pd6ml2no-dmz.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 04 Apr 2011 23:57:20 -0600\r
+Received: from jeff by fanny.gardenlogbook.com with local (Exim 4.72)\r
+       (envelope-from <jeff@jrichards.ca>)\r
+       id 1Q6z5v-0005T4-Mt; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 22:46:27 -0700\r
+Message-Id: <E1Q6z5v-0005T4-Mt@fanny.gardenlogbook.com>\r
+From: Jeff Richards <jeff@jrichards.ca>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] notmuch.vim can tag messages deleted\r
+To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
+In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinwjNQY_Mqew=KyBazodiuaKfnxMw@mail.gmail.com>\r
+References: <E1Q6YkF-0003mx-FS@fanny.gardenlogbook.com>\r
+       <BANLkTinwjNQY_Mqew=KyBazodiuaKfnxMw@mail.gmail.com>\r
+Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 22:46:27 -0700\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 05:57:21 -0000\r
+\r
+On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 18:56:52 +0300, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Jeff Richards <jeff@jrichards.ca> wrote:\r
+> > notmuch.vim plugin can use the d keybinding to remove 'inbox' and 'unread' tags and add 'deleted' from the search and show screens, the deleted tag can then be used to remove items from the maildir that are well and truly worth of deleting\r
+> \r
+> I actually have a similar patch, and the only difference I see, is\r
+> that in my version I have two actions, one for the thread, and another\r
+> one for the specific message. How about having 'D' to delete the\r
+> thread, and 'd' to delete the message?\r
+> \r
+\r
+Uh oh, How did I miss your patch?  Maybe you sent it before I started following the list.  Can you send me a pointer to your patch?\r
+\r
+Anyways, I would certainly support having two actions one to delete the thread and one to delete the message.\r