--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B04431FBD\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 08:58:46 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+ autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id 0N8hUl3rdPG9 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Sat, 25 Jan 2014 08:58:38 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155])\r
+ (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44A11431FBC\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 08:58:38 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80)\r
+ (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+ id 1W76Yu-00036Z-SG; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 12:58:28 -0400\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 26575 invoked by uid 1000); Sat, 25 Jan 2014\r
+ 16:58:25 -0000\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>, Austin Clements <aclements@csail.mit.edu>, \r
+ notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] lib: make folder: prefix literal\r
+In-Reply-To: <87iot8f4vg.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+References: <cover.1389304779.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
+ <87y525m649.fsf@awakening.csail.mit.edu> <87r47wfltb.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+ <87iot8f4vg.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+35~g3b36898 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 12:58:25 -0400\r
+Message-ID: <87lhy4nglq.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 16:58:46 -0000\r
+\r
+Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> writes:\r
+\r
+> On Sat, 25 Jan 2014, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:\r
+>> Perhaps we need to have two prefixes, one of which is the literal\r
+>> filesystem folder and another which hides the implementation details,\r
+>> like I mentioned in my mail to Peter [1]. But consider this: my proposed\r
+>> implementation does cover *all* use cases.\r
+>\r
+> Here's a thought. With boolean prefix folder:, we can devise a scheme\r
+> where the folder: query defines what is to be matched.\r
+>\r
+> For example:\r
+>\r
+> folder:foo match files in foo, foo/new, and foo/cur.\r
+> folder:foo/ match all files in all subdirectories under foo (this\r
+> would handle Tomi's use case), including foo/new and\r
+> foo/cur.\r
+\r
+handling hierarchies sounds useful and natural\r
+\r
+> folder:foo/. match in foo only, and specifically not in foo/cur or foo/new.\r
+> folder:foo/new match in foo/new, and specifically not in foo/cur (this\r
+> allows distinguishing between messages in cur and new).\r
+\r
+is "new" special cased here? or do you rely on it being a leaf\r
+directory?\r
+\r
+> folder:/ match everything.\r
+> folder:/. match in top level maildir only.\r
+> folder:"" match in top level maildir, including cur/new.\r
+\r
+I could certainly support this UI, assuming the database bloat is not\r
+too bad.\r
+\r
+I started to wonder about using 3 prefixes instead, but then I read your\r
+message again and a light went on. ;).\r
+\r
+d\r
+\r