Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Clean up reply's encoding story
authorDavid Bremner <david@tethera.net>
Sat, 17 Aug 2013 15:21:55 +0000 (17:21 +0200)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:56:23 +0000 (09:56 -0800)
15/44b9babdd80744cd13f320ed40b7de72e05c96 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/15/44b9babdd80744cd13f320ed40b7de72e05c96 b/15/44b9babdd80744cd13f320ed40b7de72e05c96
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..2f1e10e
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B71C431FC4\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 08:22:17 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id cfX2ipceqe-R for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sat, 17 Aug 2013 08:22:09 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0C5F431FC9\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 08:22:08 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80)\r
+       (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+       id 1VAiKH-0007BS-AN; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 12:22:01 -0300\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 8441 invoked by uid 1000); Sat, 17 Aug 2013\r
+       15:21:55 -0000\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>,\r
+       notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Clean up reply's encoding story\r
+In-Reply-To: <8738q8jzh3.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+References: <1376667343-10863-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu>\r
+       <87d2pclrqs.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <8738q8jzh3.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.16 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 17:21:55 +0200\r
+Message-ID: <87eh9s8hrg.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+Cc: tomi.ollila@iki.fi\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 15:22:17 -0000\r
+\r
+Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> writes:\r
+>\r
+> 'make test' now gives me:\r
+>\r
+>  FAIL   Reply with RFC 2047-encoded headers\r
+>      --- reply.12.expected   2013-08-17 11:57:31.047782938 +0000\r
+>      +++ reply.12.output     2013-08-17 11:57:31.047782938 +0000\r
+>      @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@\r
+>       From: Notmuch Test Suite <test_suite@notmuchmail.org>\r
+>      -Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?b?4N/n?=\r
+>      +Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?B?4N/n?=\r
+>       To: =?UTF-8?b?4piD?= <snowman@example.com>\r
+>       In-Reply-To: <msg-012@notmuch-test-suite>\r
+>       References: <msg-012@notmuch-test-suite>\r
+>\r
+> I'm using libgmime 2.6.16-1 from Debian testing.\r
+>\r
+\r
+Oh hmm. now that I upgrade to 2.6.16-1 I see the same thing.  It seems\r
+like something changed in gmime. I think the RFC specifies that ?b is\r
+equivalent to ?B as an encoding marker, so maybe we should normalize\r
+before comparing?\r
+\r
+d\r