Re: [PATCH v6 03/10] reply: Require that only one message is returned
authorAdam Wolfe Gordon <awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>
Sat, 10 Mar 2012 18:29:04 +0000 (11:29 +1700)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:45:23 +0000 (09:45 -0800)
ae/8ba86f4512731f8783108b537451f186a4d620 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/ae/8ba86f4512731f8783108b537451f186a4d620 b/ae/8ba86f4512731f8783108b537451f186a4d620
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..5b8fec4
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+Return-Path: <awg@xvx.ca>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB32E431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 10:29:06 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id ULFh2tJunYOT for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sat, 10 Mar 2012 10:29:06 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com\r
+       [209.85.215.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36433431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 10:29:06 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by lahc1 with SMTP id c1so2772445lah.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 10:29:04 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+       d=google.com; s=20120113;\r
+       h=mime-version:sender:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date\r
+       :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type\r
+       :x-gm-message-state;\r
+       bh=NWuezAJBGoVB4HemHs/ef68B6JpUvXp0JHbsZLzjRk4=;\r
+       b=fPpLWOgyfipjgiMgxkGsqCgMWbzmCudvhg1VCZKPH74A4rnKwPSLGdElZwErW9+QtD\r
+       wsEvio4Ao1fsGQyWbE1nmg9izmvwzIDWr/27kUsXzTbYlbUFjyUTsyCevVkjXJc1TNj1\r
+       DbV9dt0hs+I1ok2SKIcSFBvreocUy6rrfdJ7AOifdAfJVR91UMH40RjxtN350x00X9b7\r
+       sQ0ulPihdVR/BmYLoFhWF6afgtkapcDeeXUhjwzMtkdqhgkC8KX0/PRF4sHwHZDEeUyt\r
+       w8uhToyW1zP5T74XsEy8GUzNas6jYnJyKDDa182OkUMJDVjYx4wxDddGSZCjjvTIrZII\r
+       3AlA==\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Received: by 10.152.113.136 with SMTP id iy8mr4724281lab.50.1331404144506;\r
+       Sat, 10 Mar 2012 10:29:04 -0800 (PST)\r
+Sender: awg@xvx.ca\r
+Received: by 10.112.109.234 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 10:29:04 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Originating-IP: [96.52.216.56]\r
+In-Reply-To: <87fwdh8jmh.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+References: <1329893199-21630-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>\r
+       <1329893199-21630-4-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>\r
+       <87fwdh8jmh.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 11:29:04 -0700\r
+X-Google-Sender-Auth: mhy8XL8VxT0nHfWcspO4j9Vn7xo\r
+Message-ID:\r
+ <CAMoJFUv-DRGMS1SRYBvU1Z1JLDCq1trPgTLTtcs=3dWWvY7KEg@mail.gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/10] reply: Require that only one message is returned\r
+From: Adam Wolfe Gordon <awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>\r
+To: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ ALoCoQn+2xw7r8jiNFf2Q1l4BNGZtntKqtPK7RS478Cub0wmw69jfr7/Avoj9TYLhBkF9Pn6c7GQ\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 18:29:07 -0000\r
+\r
+On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 16:00, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:\r
+> On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 23:46:32 -0700, Adam Wolfe Gordon <awg+notmuch@xvx.ca> wrote:\r
+>> As the semantics of replying to multiple messages have not yet been\r
+>> defined well, make notmuch reply require that the search given returns\r
+>> only a single message.\r
+>\r
+> Is there any real reason, apart from consistency between\r
+> --format=default and --format=json, to disable the current multiple\r
+> message reply? Also "notmuch show" has format specific features and\r
+> limitations.\r
+>\r
+> I agree the semantics should be clarified, and eventually multiple\r
+> message reply should be uniformly supported by all formats, including\r
+> --format=json, but IMHO this patch should be dropped (and the TODO patch\r
+> amended accordingly).\r
+\r
+It's just for consistency. I like the idea of dropping support for\r
+multi-message replies everywhere now, then re-adding it with new\r
+semantics later, but I don't feel very strongly about it. If people\r
+who use the CLI would prefer to have the default format left as-is for\r
+now that's OK with me.\r