Re: [notmuch] Mail in git

diff --git a/4d/538839857db2aca632f8dcde4bee7f7b7672e7 b/4d/538839857db2aca632f8dcde4bee7f7b7672e7
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..c2518b2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/4d/538839857db2aca632f8dcde4bee7f7b7672e7
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+Return-Path: <madduck@lapse.rw.madduck.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB10B431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:52:21 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.953\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.953 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.646,\r
+       BAYES_00=-2.599] autolearn=ham\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id XvRthwv7okRJ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:52:20 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from clegg.madduck.net (clegg.madduck.net [193.242.105.96])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5FAB431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:52:20 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from lapse.rw.madduck.net (unknown\r
+       [IPv6:2404:130:0:1000:20a:e4ff:fe30:4316])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (Client CN "lapse.rw.madduck.net",\r
+       Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (verified OK))\r
+       by clegg.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTPS id CC08B1D409C\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:52:15 +0100 (CET)\r
+Received: by lapse.rw.madduck.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 9C75BB1E; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:52:11 +1300 (NZDT)\r
+Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:52:11 +1300\r
+From: martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net>\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Message-ID: <20100217235211.GC2628@lapse.rw.madduck.net>\r
+Mail-Followup-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+References: <20100215002914.GA22402@flamingspork.com>\r
+       <20100217012101.GD8249@lapse.rw.madduck.net>\r
+       <1266418124-sup-6308@ben-laptop>\r
+       <3wd3a0z7jjv.fsf@mhdcelk-nx01.amd.com>\r
+       <1266435265-sup-5024@ben-laptop>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;\r
+       protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hYooF8G/hrfVAmum"\r
+Content-Disposition: inline\r
+In-Reply-To: <1266435265-sup-5024@ben-laptop>\r
+X-Motto: Keep the good times rollin'\r
+X-OS: Debian GNU/Linux squeeze/sid kernel 2.6.32-1-686 i686\r
+X-Spamtrap: madduck.bogus@madduck.net\r
+X-Subliminal-Message: debian/rules!\r
+User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at clegg\r
+X-Virus-Status: Clean\r
+Subject: Re: [notmuch] Mail in git\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 23:52:22 -0000\r
+\r
+\r
+--hYooF8G/hrfVAmum\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+Content-Disposition: inline\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+also sprach Ben Gamari <bgamari@gmail.com> [2010.02.18.0834 +1300]:\r
+> Excerpts from Mark Anderson's message of Wed Feb 17 14:23:48 -0500\r
+> 2010:\r
+> > But if we have notmuch as a cache of the tags, then don't we\r
+> > already know the tree objects that need updating?  Yes, we would\r
+> > probably need some consistency checks for when things don't work\r
+> > as planned, but in the common case we ought to always know.\r
+> >=20\r
+> Cached or not, rewriting would still be an incredibly (e.g.\r
+> prohibitively or close to it) expensive operation for a large\r
+> mailstore.\r
+\r
+Why? Well, would involve creating n objects and unlinking n objects\r
+for n tags, but it would be constant in the number of messages, no?\r
+\r
+> > Perhaps I'm misunderstanding these tree objects, and you're\r
+> > suggesting that we don't even tell notmuch about them.\r
+> >=20\r
+> I think it would be unwise to teach notmuch anything about the\r
+> underlying store. That would be leaking way too many\r
+> implementation details into\r
+\r
+I agree. Also, it would introduce redundancy.\r
+\r
+--=20\r
+martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/\r
+=20\r
+"twenty-four hour room-service must be one of the\r
+ premiere achievements of modern civilization."\r
+                                          -- special agent dale cooper\r
+=20\r
+spamtraps: madduck.bogus@madduck.net\r
+\r
+--hYooF8G/hrfVAmum\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="digital_signature_gpg.asc"\r
+Content-Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)\r
+Content-Disposition: inline\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iEYEAREDAAYFAkt8gSsACgkQIgvIgzMMSnVgnwCfVX7/3z8VQJMJYi5EVEVudQ9b\r
+eT8Anix5rKJr9U+ZqY8F0ZcN7aS+dbmX\r
+=XICR\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+\r
+--hYooF8G/hrfVAmum--\r